Processed: Re: Bug#319042: mysql-dfsg still FTBFS for me

2005-10-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package mysql-dfsg
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mysql-dfsg

> reopen 319042 Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#319042: linux-kernel-headers: #include  fails from C++ due to 
function parameter called "new"
Bug reopened, originator set to Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> tag 319042 + wontfix
Bug#319042: linux-kernel-headers: #include  fails from C++ due to 
function parameter called "new"
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319042: mysql-dfsg still FTBFS for me

2005-10-07 Thread Daniel Schepler
package mysql-dfsg
reopen 319042 Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tag 319042 + wontfix
thanks

Le Vendredi 07 Octobre 2005 11:45, vous avez écrit :
> You could have got that from me, too :) Anyway, as I hopefully have made
> the situation a bit clearer now, let's just agree that the bug should not
> be closed now but that I will not spend my time on fixing it, too, as it'll
> be obsolete soon :-)

OK, based on this I'm reopening the bug (changing the submitter to myself 
while I'm at it) and tagging it "wontfix".
-- 
Daniel Schepler



Bug#319042: mysql-dfsg still FTBFS for me

2005-10-07 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello

On 2005-10-07 Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Le Mercredi 05 Octobre 2005 23:43, vous avez écrit :
> > On 2005-10-04 Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > > According to the bug log, you thought you'd fixed the FTBFS in
> > > mysql-dfsg, but I can still reproduce it in version 4.0.24-10 using a
> > > pbuilder chroot created just today:
> >
> > There is no mysql-dfsg 4.0 in Debian unstable anymore, it has been
> > superceeded by mysql-dfsg-4.1 (the existing packages are only left for the
> > shared library, the server/client packages exist with 4.1 version numbers
> > from the new package, too).
> 
> The results of running "apt-cache showsrc mysql-dfsg" disagree with you here. 
>  

For the users' point of view it has been "superceeded", from the technical
one it is still there as it provides libmysqlclient12. Once mysql-dfsg-4.1
has been installed in testing (needs to be built on sparc) and debian-release
has not too much to do with other transitions I will ask the other
maintainers to switch to libmysqlclient14 (from 4.1).

> Anyway, I'm not going to play BTS tug-of-war here, but I still disagree with 
> the bug being closed.  I'm CC'ing debian-release to get a more official 
> opinion on this.

You could have got that from me, too :) Anyway, as I hopefully have made the
situation a bit clearer now, let's just agree that the bug should not be
closed now but that I will not spend my time on fixing it, too, as it'll be
obsolete soon :-)

bye,

-christian-



Bug#319042: mysql-dfsg still FTBFS for me

2005-10-07 Thread Daniel Schepler
Le Mercredi 05 Octobre 2005 23:43, vous avez écrit :
> On 2005-10-04 Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > According to the bug log, you thought you'd fixed the FTBFS in
> > mysql-dfsg, but I can still reproduce it in version 4.0.24-10 using a
> > pbuilder chroot created just today:
>
> There is no mysql-dfsg 4.0 in Debian unstable anymore, it has been
> superceeded by mysql-dfsg-4.1 (the existing packages are only left for the
> shared library, the server/client packages exist with 4.1 version numbers
> from the new package, too).

The results of running "apt-cache showsrc mysql-dfsg" disagree with you here.  
Anyway, my understanding is that having packages in unstable which cannot be 
built from source is a serious policy violation and must be fixed.  It would 
also be good to have a new upload anyway removing the superceded 
mysql-{client,server,common} packages from the source package.

By the way, the libmysqlclient12-dev package is still in unstable, too, and 
lots of packages still Build-Depend on it.  Do you consider that such 
packages must be recompiled against newer libraries, or is that only 
something that would be nice?

Anyway, I'm not going to play BTS tug-of-war here, but I still disagree with 
the bug being closed.  I'm CC'ing debian-release to get a more official 
opinion on this.

(If this message too ends up showing "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" as the 
sender, ignore that and use the address below -- that dynamic DNS entry is 
only available 8 hours a day on weekdays.  I think I have things set up right 
now, but I'm not completely sure.)
-- 
Daniel Schepler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319042: mysql-dfsg still FTBFS for me

2005-10-04 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello

On 2005-10-04 Daniel Schepler wrote:
> According to the bug log, you thought you'd fixed the FTBFS in
> mysql-dfsg, but I can still reproduce it in version 4.0.24-10 using a
> pbuilder chroot created just today:
Please report the exact version you tried and on which architecture 
(`dpkg-architecture`) you tried to build it.

bye,

-christian-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]