Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:29:12 +0200 (METDST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322706: /usr/bin/ghemical: Missing dependency on lapack3
and refblas3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 10:40:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 03:40:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kalium.kiku.dk [130.225.100.59]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E3Wxe-0005Nr-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 03:40:26 -0700
Received: from positron.kiku.dk ([130.225.100.61])
by kalium.kiku.dk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2)
id 1E3WxU-0005Ep-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:40:16 +0200
Received: from moffe by positron.kiku.dk with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E3WxT-00041g-Mq; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:40:15 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /usr/bin/ghemical: Missing dependency on lapack3 and refblas3
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:40:14 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ghemical
Version: 1.51-1
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/ghemical
Justification: renders package unusable
Ghemical is missing dependency on lapack3 and refblas3:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ldd /usr/bin/ghemical
[...]
liblapack.so.3 => not found
libblas.so.3 => not found
[...]
"apt-get install lapack3 refblas3" installs the missing packages after
which ghemical works fine.
Regards
/Rasmus
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3
Locale: LANG=da_DK.ISO8859-1, LC_CTYPE=da_DK.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
(ignored: LC_ALL set to da_DK.ISO8859-1)
Versions of packages ghemical depends on:
ii atlas3-base [liblapack.so 3.6.0-19 Automatically Tuned Linear Algebra
ii freeglut3 2.2.0-8.1 OpenGL Utility Toolkit
ii gdk-imlib1 1.9.14-16.2 imaging library for use with gtk (
ii gtkglarea5 1.2.3-2 Gimp Toolkit OpenGL area widget sh
ii libart2 1.4.2-20 The GNOME canvas widget - runtime
ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii libc6 2.3.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb3 3.2.9-22 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru
ii libesd0 0.2.36-1 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared
ii libg2c0 1:3.4.4-5 Runtime library for GNU Fortran 77
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-4 GCC support library
ii libghemical0 1.90-1 Molecular Modelling Library
ii libglade-gnome0 1:0.17-3 Library to load .glade files at ru
ii libglade0 1:0.17-3 Library to load .glade files at ru
ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-10 The GLib library of C routines
ii libglu1-xorg [libglu1] 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Mesa OpenGL utility library [X.Org
ii libgnome32 1.4.2-20 The GNOME libraries
ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.2-20 The GNOME libraries (Support libra
ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-20 The GNOME libraries (User Interfac
ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-17 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libopenbabel0c2 1.100.2-3 Convert and manipulate chemical da
ii libsc6c2 2.2.3-2 The Scientific Computing Toolkit
ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Session Management
ii libstdc++6 4.0.1-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxi6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Input extension li
ii libxml1 1:1.8.17-10 GNOME XML library
ii mpqc 2.2.3-2 The Massively Parallel Quantum Che
ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Mesa 3D graphics library [X.Org]
ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-3 compression library - runtime
ghemical recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 322706-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Aug 2005 09:29:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 13 02:29:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from neutrino.kiku.dk [130.225.100.50]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E3sKL-0003Ab-00; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 02:29:17 -0700
Received: from neutrino.kiku.dk ([130.225.100.50])
by neutrino.kiku.dk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
id 1E3sKG-00070B-00; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:29:12 +0200
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:29:12 +0200 (METDST)
From: Rasmus B Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#322706: /usr/bin/ghemical: Missing dependency on lapack3
and refblas3
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Rasmus B=F8g Hansen wrote:
> > Ghemical is missing dependency on lapack3 and refblas3:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ldd /usr/bin/ghemical
> > [...]
> > liblapack.so.3 =3D> not found
> > libblas.so.3 =3D> not found
> > [...]
> >
> > "apt-get install lapack3 refblas3" installs the missing packages after
> > which ghemical works fine.
>
> Hmm, ghemical here has the following Depends:
>
> nighthawk~/build$ dpkg -I ghemical_1.51-1_i386.deb |grep Depends
> Depends: atlas3-base | lapack3 | liblapack.so.3, atlas3-base | refblas3
> =09| libblas.so.3
>
> Did you have atlas3-base installed? Perhaps you need to add
> /usr/lib/atlas/ to /etc/ld.so.conf, I am not uptodate with that atlas
> stuff, maybe there is some documentation in /usr/share/doc/atlas3-base
> about this. If this is the case, could you please test this by removing
> lapack3 and refblas3 again and proceed as indicated by the atlas
> packages?
Apparently the problem was the missing line in /etc/ld.so.conf; perhaps
from an old installation of atlas.
Anyway, now I can't reproduce it on neither the formerly problematic
machine, nor on another sid machine which never had ghemical installed.
On the first machine I purged atlas and reinstalled ghemical; no
problems at all...
atlas3-base is pulled in as by dependencies and the correct line is
added to ld.so.conf.
I close the bug as it seems to be unreproducible now.
Regards
/Rasmus
--=20
Rasmus B=F8g Hansen | Department of Chemistry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | University of Copenhagen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
