Processed: Re: Bug#328602: very old package, should this be removed?

2005-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 328602 wnpp
Bug#328602: very old package, should this be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `redir' to `wnpp'.

> retitle 328602 RFA: redir needs new maintainer
Bug#328602: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.

> severity 328602 normal
Bug#328602: RFA: redir needs new maintainer
Severity set to `normal'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#328602: very old package, should this be removed?

2005-09-16 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
reassign 328602 wnpp
retitle 328602 RFA: redir needs new maintainer
severity 328602 normal
thanks

On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 12:32:32PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign
> this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan it) or
> ftp.debian.org (in case we propose to remove it).

I have uploaded a new version 2.1-3. This package is still usefull and works.
There is a new upstream version which should be packaged, I am looking for a
new Maintainer.

Gruss
Bernd


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#328602: very old package, should this be removed?

2005-09-16 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Package: redir
Version: 2.1-2.1
Severity: serious

Hi,

During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.

I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose
to remove it.
It has not that many users, there are some alternatives available
(rinetd, xinetd), the package was NMUed and the changes weren't
incorporated and it is quite out of date wrt Debian's policies.

This usually means that your package matched some of the following
criteria:

 [1] Your packages has not had a maintainer upload for more than
 three years.

 [2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**)

 [3] the state of your packages in general seems to indicate that you
 might be MIA 

 [4] (if we propose a removal) it shows in popcon as having less than
 100 users with the package installed.

 [5] the package was not released with sarge

and at least ([1] and ( [2] or [3] or [4] or [5] )) was true.

(**) The maintainer not answering to RC bugs refers to bugs filed
more than one month before the time the check was performed.

After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign
this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan it) or
ftp.debian.org (in case we propose to remove it).

The package will need an upload or an explanation for this action not to
proceed.

Please do *not* upload a package just to get off this list - it won't
help the package at all. Maintainers should be responsive and feel
responsible for their packages without needing other people to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users. 

Thanks!

Marc



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]