Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329487: fixed in xmpi 2.2.3b8-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 04:29:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 21:29:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp2.stanford.edu [171.67.16.125]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIIi0-0003Kx-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:29:20 -0700
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147])
by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8M4TJ71028130
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:29:19 -0700
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 05FDDE7DDB; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xmpi: needs rebuild for lam transition
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:29:18 -0700
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xmpi
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Due to C++ libraries in the package, lam had to change shared library
package names as part of the C++ transition. rmpi now needs to be
rebuilt with the new version of lam so that it can migrate into testing.
Please upload a new version of rmpi with a versioned build-depends on:
lam4-dev (>= 7.1.1-3.2)
This is necessary since m68k has not yet built the new lam; otherwise,
the new upload may get built against the old lam libraries on that
platform.
If you can get to this soon, that would be best, as all of lam, hdf5,
and mpich are currently caught up in a large transition.
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329487-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 14:39:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 07:39:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ENtGb-00011B-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:32:09 -0700
From: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#329487: fixed in xmpi 2.2.3b8-9
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:32:09 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: xmpi
Source-Version: 2.2.3b8-9
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmpi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libxmpi4-dev_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xmpi/libxmpi4-dev_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb
libxmpi4_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xmpi/libxmpi4_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb
xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xmpi/xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.diff.gz
xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.dsc
to pool/main/x/xmpi/xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.dsc
xmpi_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xmpi/xmpi_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xmpi package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:21:22 +0000
Source: xmpi
Binary: libxmpi4-dev libxmpi4 xmpi
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.3b8-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libxmpi4 - A graphical user interface for MPI program development
libxmpi4-dev - A graphical user interface for MPI program development
xmpi - A graphical user interface for MPI program development
Closes: 329487
Changes:
xmpi (2.2.3b8-9) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Rebuild against latest lam for C++ transition, Closes: #329487.
* newer standards
Files:
475d070c82064514d78c88f14cc9cdc8 645 devel optional xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.dsc
9161218571a08edfefa6e9804d424ddf 85033 devel optional xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.diff.gz
08365df522fbbe0a874b62fa855d35ac 95594 devel extra xmpi_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb
3a8843ffe33a752b1ece021e1e567421 36738 libs optional
libxmpi4_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb
4cd497a4ee347f3ea3d19b0413814c3a 91680 libdevel optional
libxmpi4-dev_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDRoSjczG1wFfwRdwRAjzcAJ92hX+JzEFRbQ6jqv6tZwtf/hvlswCgjVh1
E4ixEUnJudX2jfR2/TW2yTg=
=ASDK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
