Bug#333522: linux-image-2.6.14-1-686-smp: occurs in stock linux-image as well

2005-10-31 Thread Paul Traina
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.14-1
Followup-For: Bug #333522

udev/unstable uptodate 0.071-1

Just to cover the blanks, it is occuring as well with stock 2.6.14
debian kernels.  This is a straight kernel built with an up to date
initramfs tools.  initramfs-tools rebuilt the initramfs several times
(I've beend debugging evms) while running 2.6.14 and depmod -a's have
occured.

Let me know if I can test/help/hack.  I'm 99.9% certain its due to
modprobe being called in parallel by the new udev code.  Don't
understand why m-i-t isn't serializing the right bits.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-1-686-smp depends on:
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.37   tools for generating an initramfs
ii  module-init-tools 3.2-pre9-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.14-1-686-smp recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#333522: linux-image-2.6.14-1-686-smp: occurs in stock linux-image as well

2005-10-31 Thread Horms
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 03:10:29PM -0800, Paul Traina wrote:
 Package: linux-image-2.6.14-1-686-smp
 Version: 2.6.14-1
 Followup-For: Bug #333522
 
 udev/unstable uptodate 0.071-1
 
 Just to cover the blanks, it is occuring as well with stock 2.6.14
 debian kernels.  This is a straight kernel built with an up to date
 initramfs tools.  initramfs-tools rebuilt the initramfs several times
 (I've beend debugging evms) while running 2.6.14 and depmod -a's have
 occured.
 
 Let me know if I can test/help/hack.  I'm 99.9% certain its due to
 modprobe being called in parallel by the new udev code.  Don't
 understand why m-i-t isn't serializing the right bits.

Yes, that seems to be the current school of thought.
Rusty has been thinking it over with Marco, but we are
yet to find the solution.

-- 
Horms


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]