Bug#336752: moderation of bug reports #350847 and #353458

2006-05-14 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 04:45:21PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:

 > IMHO all packages using this address as the maintainer address should
 > get an RC bug because the maintainer contact is not reachable. The
 > list should at least accept mails from the BTS without complaining
 > bug reporters about list moderation.

 The bugs make it to the BTS, just not to the mailing list.

 Bug reports arrive to the mailing list with a From: field set to the
 submitter's email, which is exactly as it should be.

 I stupidly didn't think of this when I created the mailing list and
 since SPAM on Debian mailing lists is so bad I set it to
 subscriber-only which is causing this problem.

 To further complicate matters I can't find the administrative password
 for the mailing list, a situation which Mailman handles in the worst
 possible way.

 Sorry about the trouble, as soon as I get the password resetted I'll
 remove the problematic setting (with the visible consequence of more
 spam making its way here)

 Marcelo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#336752: moderation of bug reports #350847 and #353458

2006-03-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 16:45]:
> > I submitted 2 bugs about libgl1-mesa-dri on Radeon X300 (#350847 and 
> > #353458) about a month ago. But I got a message saying that my reports 
> > would have to be moderated. It does not seem to have been done so far. 
> > Is anybody aware of my bug reports ? :)
> I already filed a similar bug[1]. It was closed because the specific
> package was removed, and not because the problems with
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the Debian maintainer contact

Oh, for the record: we are not going to reopen a bug report about an
Alioth list being moderated.  We'll handle that in another way.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#336752: moderation of bug reports #350847 and #353458

2006-03-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 16:45]:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:20:42 -0500, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > I submitted 2 bugs about libgl1-mesa-dri on Radeon X300 (#350847 and 
> > #353458) about a month ago. But I got a message saying that my reports 
> > would have to be moderated. It does not seem to have been done so far. 
> > Is anybody aware of my bug reports ? :)
> I already filed a similar bug[1].

Is there a bug I closed that still applies in a renamed package?  IOW,
do I need to reopen and reassign some bug?  If so, please tell me
which one.

> It was closed because the specific
> package was removed, and not because the problems with
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the Debian maintainer contact
> were solved regarding bug reports.
> 
> IMHO all packages using this address as the maintainer address should
> get an RC bug because the maintainer contact is not reachable. The list
> should at least accept mails from the BTS without complaining bug
> reporters about list moderation.

Many alioth contact lists have the same problem.  I'm currently trying
to figure out whether it's possible to stop that crap and accept mail
from the BTS via bitching.  I agree with you that refusing BTS mail is
not acceptable.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#336752: moderation of bug reports #350847 and #353458

2006-03-21 Thread Tino Keitel
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:20:42 -0500, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I submitted 2 bugs about libgl1-mesa-dri on Radeon X300 (#350847 and 
> #353458) about a month ago. But I got a message saying that my reports 
> would have to be moderated. It does not seem to have been done so far. 
> Is anybody aware of my bug reports ? :)

I already filed a similar bug[1]. It was closed because the specific
package was removed, and not because the problems with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as the Debian maintainer contact
were solved regarding bug reports.

IMHO all packages using this address as the maintainer address should
get an RC bug because the maintainer contact is not reachable. The list
should at least accept mails from the BTS without complaining bug
reporters about list moderation.

Regards,
Tino

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=336752


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]