Bug#353600: libxul-dev: Should conflict with mozilla-browser
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:21:49PM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:13:01AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:51:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Package: libxul-dev Version: 1.8.0.1-2 Severity: serious The file /usr/lib/libxpcom.so can also be found in mozilla-browser. Though there are dependencies on packages that already conflict with it, there should also be an explicit conflict in libxul-dev. Shouldn't a Replaces: be sufficient here? If libxul-dev was compatible with mozilla-browser, it would. Presumably, libxpcom.so is just a symlink, so shouldn't be a major cause of compatibility problems...? I dunno. Jordi has mentioned on IRC that there are other file conflicts, and that the libs probably are not ABI compatible? That's what I meant, they are not ABI compatible. mozilla-browser provides gecko 1.7, xulrunner gecko 1.8. They are incompatible. mozilla-browser is dead anyway, maybe it should just be removed. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#353600: libxul-dev: Should conflict with mozilla-browser
Package: libxul-dev Version: 1.8.0.1-2 Severity: serious The file /usr/lib/libxpcom.so can also be found in mozilla-browser. Though there are dependencies on packages that already conflict with it, there should also be an explicit conflict in libxul-dev. Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#353600: libxul-dev: Should conflict with mozilla-browser
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Package: libxul-dev Version: 1.8.0.1-2 Severity: serious The file /usr/lib/libxpcom.so can also be found in mozilla-browser. Though there are dependencies on packages that already conflict with it, there should also be an explicit conflict in libxul-dev. Shouldn't a Replaces: be sufficient here? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#353600: libxul-dev: Should conflict with mozilla-browser
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:51:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Package: libxul-dev Version: 1.8.0.1-2 Severity: serious The file /usr/lib/libxpcom.so can also be found in mozilla-browser. Though there are dependencies on packages that already conflict with it, there should also be an explicit conflict in libxul-dev. Shouldn't a Replaces: be sufficient here? If libxul-dev was compatible with mozilla-browser, it would. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#353600: libxul-dev: Should conflict with mozilla-browser
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:13:01AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:51:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Package: libxul-dev Version: 1.8.0.1-2 Severity: serious The file /usr/lib/libxpcom.so can also be found in mozilla-browser. Though there are dependencies on packages that already conflict with it, there should also be an explicit conflict in libxul-dev. Shouldn't a Replaces: be sufficient here? If libxul-dev was compatible with mozilla-browser, it would. Presumably, libxpcom.so is just a symlink, so shouldn't be a major cause of compatibility problems...? I dunno. Jordi has mentioned on IRC that there are other file conflicts, and that the libs probably are not ABI compatible? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
