Processed: Re: Bug#369890: silo: build-depends on gcc-2.95, which may be removed for etch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 369890 patch Bug#369890: silo: build-depends on gcc-2.95, which may be removed for etch There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369890: silo: build-depends on gcc-2.95, which may be removed for etch
tags 369890 patch
thanks
Hi,
I've prepared updated silo package (patch attached), including a fix for
this bug. It has been updated to the latest available upstream, built with
gcc-4.1 in pbuilder, and tested on both sparc32 and sparc64. A couple of
lintian errors have been fixed (a few warnings still remain). Ben, if it's
ok with you, I would like to upload it (I added myself to uploaders, so
it's not going to be an NMU).
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CCdiff -aurN a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
--- a/debian/changelog 2006-04-22 07:45:27.0 -0700
+++ b/debian/changelog 2006-06-07 23:01:27.0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+silo (1.4.12-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Update to new upstream release (1.4.12).
+ * Remove 10-sun4u_notimer.patch, included upstream.
+ * Add 10-silo_get_architecture.patch, making it possible
+to build a working SILO with gcc-4.1. Closes: #369890.
+ * Change the build-dependency from gcc-2.95 to gcc-4.1 and use it
+for building.
+ * Add explicit build-dependency on perl, scripts in debian/scripts
+require it (lintian error).
+ * Make sure that /etc/silo.conf is registered as conffile only
+once by modifying debian/packages.d/silo.in (lintian error).
+ * Upstream does not ship a changelog anymore, adjust
+debian/rules appropriately.
+ * Add myself to uploaders.
+
+ -- Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 7 Jun 2006 20:46:16 -0700
+
silo (1.4.11-0.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-Maintainer Upload.
diff -aurN a/debian/control b/debian/control
--- a/debian/control2006-01-19 06:15:30.0 -0800
+++ b/debian/control2006-06-07 23:02:30.0 -0700
@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
Section: base
Priority: important
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends: e2fslibs-dev (= 1.28-1), debhelper (= 5.0), gcc-2.95, bzip2,
sparc-utils
+Uploaders: Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+Build-Depends: e2fslibs-dev (= 1.28-1), debhelper (= 5.0), gcc-4.1, bzip2,
sparc-utils, perl
Standards-Version: 3.2.1.0
Package: silo
diff -aurN a/debian/packages.d/silo.in b/debian/packages.d/silo.in
--- a/debian/packages.d/silo.in 2006-01-19 05:46:55.0 -0800
+++ b/debian/packages.d/silo.in 2006-06-07 22:14:43.0 -0700
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
-%conffiles%
-/etc/silo.conf
%postinst%
#!/bin/sh
/usr/sbin/siloconfig
diff -aurN a/debian/patches/10-silo_get_architecture.patch
b/debian/patches/10-silo_get_architecture.patch
--- a/debian/patches/10-silo_get_architecture.patch 1969-12-31
16:00:00.0 -0800
+++ b/debian/patches/10-silo_get_architecture.patch 2006-06-04
00:50:08.0 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+diff -aur a/second/misc.c b/second/misc.c
+--- a/second/misc.c2006-03-08 10:41:35.0 -0800
b/second/misc.c2006-06-04 00:30:07.0 -0700
+@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@
+
+ enum arch silo_get_architecture(void)
+ {
+-char *buffer = sun4c;
++char buffer[] = sun4c;
+ int i;
+
+ if (prom_vers == PROM_P1275) {
diff -aurN a/debian/patches/10-sun4u_notimer.patch
b/debian/patches/10-sun4u_notimer.patch
--- a/debian/patches/10-sun4u_notimer.patch 2006-04-22 11:42:03.0
-0700
+++ b/debian/patches/10-sun4u_notimer.patch 1969-12-31 16:00:00.0
-0800
@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
silo-1.4.11/second/timer.c.~1~ 2006-04-20 21:18:49.0 -0700
-+++ silo-1.4.11/second/timer.c 2006-04-20 21:21:19.0 -0700
-@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
- static volatile struct sun4c_timer_info *sun4c_timer;
- static unsigned char *addr_to_free = 0;
- static int len_to_free;
-+static unsigned long long sun4u_tickcmpr;
-+static int sun4u_notimer = 0;
- static struct mostek48t02 *mregs;
- static long clock_frequency;
-
-@@ -154,6 +156,16 @@
- }
- if (!foundcpu || !clock_frequency)
- clock_frequency = prom_getint(prom_root_node, clock-frequency) /
100;
-+if (notimer) {
-+sun4u_notimer = 1;
-+__asm__ __volatile__ (\t
-+ rd %%tick_cmpr, %%g1\n\t
-+ stx%%g1, [%0]\n\t
-+ mov1, %%g1\n\t
-+ sllx%%g1, 63, %%g1\n\t
-+ wr %%g1, 0, %%tick_cmpr
-+ : : r (sun4u_tickcmpr) : g1);
-+}
- return 0;
- }
-
-@@ -194,6 +206,12 @@
-
- void close_timer ()
- {
-+if (sun4u_notimer) {
-+__asm__ __volatile__(\t
-+ ldx[%0], %%g1\n\t
-+ wr %%g1, 0, %%tick_cmpr
-+ : : r (sun4u_tickcmpr) : g1);
-+}
- if (addr_to_free) {
- if (addr_to_free == (unsigned char *)0x)
- sun4c_unmapio (TICKER_VIRTUAL);
diff -aurN a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
--- a/debian/rules 2006-03-25 14:13:42.0 -0800
+++ b/debian/rules 2006-06-07 20:59:03.0 -0700
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
#!/usr/bin/make -f
# the dbs rules
-TAR_DIR := silo-1.4.11
+TAR_DIR := silo-1.4.12
Bug#369890: silo: build-depends on gcc-2.95, which may be removed for etch
On Thursday 08 June 2006 09:08, Jurij Smakov wrote: I've prepared updated silo package (patch attached), including a fix for this bug. It has been updated to the latest available upstream, built with gcc-4.1 in pbuilder, and tested on both sparc32 and sparc64. +++ b/debian/control 2006-06-07 23:02:30.0 -0700 [...] +Build-Depends: e2fslibs-dev (= 1.28-1), debhelper (= 5.0), gcc-4.1, ^^^ bzip2, sparc-utils, perl Shouldn't silo just depend on current gcc instead of on an explicit version no that the need to depend on 2.95 is gone? pgp69xQRcoygu.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#369890: silo: build-depends on gcc-2.95, which may be removed for etch
Frans Pop wrote: Shouldn't silo just depend on current gcc instead of on an explicit version no that the need to depend on 2.95 is gone? It's not necessary, but I thought it's not a bad idea to leave it like this. At least it improves the chances that there will be no surprises next time the compiler changes :-). Oh, and it's probably worth acknowledging the previous NMUs with the next upload too. Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369890: silo: build-depends on gcc-2.95, which may be removed for etch
Ben Collins wrote: Just change the build-dep, it should be needed anymore. If it's hardcoded in the makefile, change that too. I tried building silo with gcc-4.1. It works on sparc64, but hangs on sparc32, so the problem is not resolved yet. I did not have time to investigate it yet. Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369890: silo: build-depends on gcc-2.95, which may be removed for etch
Package: silo Version: 1.4.11-0.2 Severity: serious The silo bootloader package build-depends on gcc-2.95 at the version currently in unstable, making it the only package of any substance which does so. The gcc-2.95 package itself is RC-buggy, failing to build with the current version of make; since there has been no interest expressed in fixing this bug by the maintainer, the likely outcome is that gcc-2.95 will be dropped from etch, leaving sparc without a releasable bootloader. There are two possible solutions: - silo gets updated to use a more recent compiler, dropping this build-dep - someone adopts gcc-2.95, fixing the FTBFS, and maintaining it for etch X-Debbugs-Cc: to debian-sparc. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#369890: silo: build-depends on gcc-2.95, which may be removed for etch
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 16:35 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Package: silo Version: 1.4.11-0.2 Severity: serious The silo bootloader package build-depends on gcc-2.95 at the version currently in unstable, making it the only package of any substance which does so. The gcc-2.95 package itself is RC-buggy, failing to build with the current version of make; since there has been no interest expressed in fixing this bug by the maintainer, the likely outcome is that gcc-2.95 will be dropped from etch, leaving sparc without a releasable bootloader. There are two possible solutions: - silo gets updated to use a more recent compiler, dropping this build-dep - someone adopts gcc-2.95, fixing the FTBFS, and maintaining it for etch Just change the build-dep, it should be needed anymore. If it's hardcoded in the makefile, change that too. -- Ubuntu - http://www.ubuntu.com/ Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ SwissDisk - http://www.swissdisk.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
