Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds

2006-10-02 Thread Simon Josefsson
Package: ircd-hybrid
Version: 0.4.5-1
Severity: serious

Hi!

It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:

/usr/share/doc/ircd-hybrid/technical/draft-mitchell-irc-capabilities-01.txt.gz

The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation

I believe the options are:

1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging
   the source code).

2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include
   re-packaging the source code).

If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several
packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in
this thread:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993

The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg.

I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages
looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives.

Thanks,
Simon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds

2006-10-02 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
version 390667 1:7.2.2-2
thanks

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:35:19PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
 It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
 
 /usr/share/doc/ircd-hybrid/technical/draft-mitchell-irc-capabilities-01.txt.gz
 
 The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:
 
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation
 
 I believe the options are:
 
 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging
the source code).

I will remove the file from both source and binary packages.

 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include
re-packaging the source code).
 
 If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several
 packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in
 this thread:
 
 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993

So far, I only disagree with the version. ;)

 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy
 http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg.

Sure.

 I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages
 looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives.

Expect it to be fixed at the next upload with version 1:7.2.2.dsfg-1.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.   Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :'  :
`. `'`   Free Software Developer
  `- Unix Sys  Net Admin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds

2006-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 390667 pending
Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds

2006-10-02 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
tags 390667 pending
thanks

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:27:54PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
 Expect it to be fixed at the next upload with version 1:7.2.2.dsfg-1.

Thanks for the bug report too!

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.   Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :'  :
`. `'`   Free Software Developer
  `- Unix Sys  Net Admin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds

2006-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 found 390667 1:7.2.2-2
Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds
Bug marked as found in version 1:7.2.2-2.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds

2006-10-02 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
found 390667 1:7.2.2-2
thanks

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:33:39PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:27:54PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
  Expect it to be fixed at the next upload with version 1:7.2.2.dsfg-1.

I will modify the source tarball name or version. If you can suggest
me your preference on that, it would help me a bit. :)

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.   Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :'  :
`. `'`   Free Software Developer
  `- Unix Sys  Net Admin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds

2006-10-02 Thread Simon Josefsson


On 2 okt 2006, at 23.05, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:


found 390667 1:7.2.2-2
thanks

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:33:39PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:27:54PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Expect it to be fixed at the next upload with version  
1:7.2.2.dsfg-1.


I will modify the source tarball name or version. If you can suggest
me your preference on that, it would help me a bit. :)


I've seen several packages that used 'dfsg' in the version field, but  
none that used a modified package name.  I don't really know, but it  
seems that using the version field would at least be consistent with  
other packages.


Thanks for working so fast on this!

/Simon