On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 00:45 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > Just for record, gecko-sharp should not enter testing.
> > gecko-sharp2 is the replacement for it which is in testing and uses
> > xulrunner instead of obsolete mozilla.
> 
> Shouldn't you be filing a removal bug then, to get the package removed
> from Debian altogether?

good point, but there is one reverse-dependency left (blam), and that
would make it uninstallable in unstable.

-- 
Regards,

Mirco 'meebey' Bauer

PGP-Key:
http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL++++$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O---- M-
V? PS
PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to