Bug#394626: closed by Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#394626: fixed in qdbm 1.8.70-1.1)

2006-11-03 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:49:35AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>* Use -O0 in CXXFLAGS in plus/Makefile.in instead of -O1, to avoid an
>  ICE when building on alpha.  Closes: #394626.

I thought people were credited in changelog entries when they provided
a patch which was later applied/adapted. I must have been wrong...

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.   Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :'  :
`. `'`   Free Software Developer
  `- Unix Sys & Net Admin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#394626: closed by Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#394626: fixed in qdbm 1.8.70-1.1)

2006-11-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:07:18AM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:49:35AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >* Use -O0 in CXXFLAGS in plus/Makefile.in instead of -O1, to avoid an
> >  ICE when building on alpha.  Closes: #394626.

> I thought people were credited in changelog entries when they provided
> a patch which was later applied/adapted. I must have been wrong...

Sorry, it didn't occur to me that you would feel strongly about being
credited here.  This doesn't mean that I don't appreciate your work, it just
means (in my case) that I didn't use your patch directly, but re-derived it
after testing on alpha.  FWIW, the maintainer's upload also doesn't appear
to credit you; as I don't intend to re-NMU just to fix the crediting, you
might ask the maintainer to make this change in his next version.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/



Bug#394626: closed by Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#394626: fixed in qdbm 1.8.70-1.1)

2006-11-03 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:03:36PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Sorry, it didn't occur to me that you would feel strongly about being
> credited here.  This doesn't mean that I don't appreciate your work, it just
> means (in my case) that I didn't use your patch directly, but re-derived it
> after testing on alpha.  FWIW, the maintainer's upload also doesn't appear
> to credit you; as I don't intend to re-NMU just to fix the crediting, you
> might ask the maintainer to make this change in his next version.

I bear no grudge against you for this. It is just a trivial workaround
anyway, the real bug being in gcc (#394630). Also, my wording may
have been too strong.

I have been told that I am not qualified to even be accepted in NM (not
being visible on the BTS for instance), so I was a bit blood-headed
when I looked at the changelog entry. :)

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.   Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :'  :
`. `'`   Free Software Developer
  `- Unix Sys & Net Admin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature