Bug#407537: sdljump: should be removed from testing
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 01:07:07PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (19/01/2007): > > Now that gnujump has entered testing, sdljump should be removed from > > the archive. The package has been renamed. > > Hi, > > wouldn't be a RoM (bug against ftpmaster) the way to go? Yes, I sent that as well, but I wanted an RC bug to make even more sure that it doesn't get released with Etch. Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#407537: sdljump: should be removed from testing
Package: sdljump Version: 1.0.0-2 Severity: serious Now that gnujump has entered testing, sdljump should be removed from the archive. The package has been renamed. -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#407537: sdljump: should be removed from testing
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (19/01/2007): > Now that gnujump has entered testing, sdljump should be removed from > the archive. The package has been renamed. Hi, wouldn't be a RoM (bug against ftpmaster) the way to go? Cheers, -- Cyril pgpousb0Hcw2n.pgp Description: PGP signature
