Processed: Re: Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 409691 atlas3-base
Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58:  1020 Illegal instruction
Bug reassigned from package `octave2.9-forge' to `atlas3-base'.

 severity 409691 serious
Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58:  1020 Illegal instruction
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: octave2.9-forge
Version: 2006.07.09+dfsg1-7
Severity: serious

It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch).
Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this?

 Automatic build of octave2.9-forge_2006.07.09+dfsg1-7 on em64t by 
 sbuild/amd64 0.52
...
   Arithmetic operators: PASSED
   Logical operators:PASSED
   Polynomial manipulation:  PASSED
   Linear Algebra:   PASSED
   Signal Processing functions:  PASSED
 
 [main/fixed]
 fixed
 
  Fixed Point Load Type 
   Found Fixed Point Toolbox (version 0.7.0)
 
  Fixed Point Creation 
   Scalar Creation:  PASSED
   Matrix Creation:  error: can't perform indexing 
 operations for fixed matrix type
 
 [main/image]
 panic: Illegal instruction -- stopping myself...
 admin/run_forge: line 58:  1020 Illegal instruction $*
 make[1]: *** [check] Error 132
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/octave2.9-forge-2006.07.09+dfsg1'
 make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-check] Error 2

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:20:22PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
 Package: octave2.9-forge
 Version: 2006.07.09+dfsg1-7
 Severity: serious
 
 It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch).
 Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this?

It works for me.  Are you trying this with a different version of gcc or
something?


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-04 21:26]:
  It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch).
  Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this?
 It works for me.  Are you trying this with a different version of gcc or
 something?

No, I verified the problem with the standard gcc in Debian.

I guess one possible difference is that this box is an EM64T box
rather than AMD64.  This shouldn't make a difference in theory but who
knows... any idea what I could do to find out more about this problem?
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 09:40:59PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
 * Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-04 21:26]:
   It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch).
   Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this?
  It works for me.  Are you trying this with a different version of gcc or
  something?
 
 No, I verified the problem with the standard gcc in Debian.
 
 I guess one possible difference is that this box is an EM64T box
 rather than AMD64.  This shouldn't make a difference in theory but who
 knows... any idea what I could do to find out more about this problem?

Let it dump core or something, and dissasseble the generated code it
crashed on.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#409691: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-04 21:26]:

 On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:20:22PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
  Package: octave2.9-forge
  Version: 2006.07.09+dfsg1-7
  Severity: serious
  
  It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch).
  Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this?
 
 It works for me.  Are you trying this with a different version of gcc or
 something?

May I lower the severity of this bug report to normal?  The package has
already been correctly auto-built on amd64 [1].  It seems that there is a
problem in Martin's system (at least, I hope so!).

Best,

-- 
Rafael

[1] 
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=octave2.9-forgever=2006.07.09%2Bdfsg1-7arch=amd64stamp=1168721324file=log


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#409691: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-04 21:40]:

 * Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-04 21:26]:
   It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch).
   Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this?
  It works for me.  Are you trying this with a different version of gcc or
  something?
 
 No, I verified the problem with the standard gcc in Debian.
 
 I guess one possible difference is that this box is an EM64T box
 rather than AMD64.  This shouldn't make a difference in theory but who
 knows... any idea what I could do to find out more about this problem?

According to the build log that you posted, the problem occurs when calling
the testimio.m script.  This script calls modules that link against 
libjpeg62 and libpng12-0.  Do these libraries have problems on EM64T?

-- 
Rafael


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 409691 normal
Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58:  1020 Illegal instruction
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#409691: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
severity 409691 normal
thanks

* Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-04 22:03]:
 May I lower the severity of this bug report to normal?  The package
 has already been correctly auto-built on amd64 [1].  It seems that
 there is a problem in Martin's system (at least, I hope so!).

Yes, definitely.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]