Bug#415233: gpgme1.0: FTBFS: Can't find GNU Pth

2007-03-22 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi José Carlos,

FWIW I'm not content with the implemented solution as far as inclusion in
etch is concerned.  Previous versions of the package clearly did not need
libpth20, the new version does and the effect on the package's behavior as a
result of this new library dep seem to be unknown.

The package also includes this change:

@@ -5,9 +5,6 @@
 # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode.
 #export DH_VERBOSE=1

-# This is the debhelper compatability version to use.
-export DH_COMPAT=3
-
 # C compiler information
 CC  = gcc
 CFLAGS  = -Wall -g

This is a behavior change from the previous version of the package, because
DH_COMPAT takes precedence over debian/compat, so this is very much not a
change that's suitable during a freeze.

So unless the security team overrules me, I don't think this version of the
package should be allowed into etch as-is.

(It's also currently held out of etch because it depends on the
security-fixed gnupg which is not yet available, but that problem should
clear up on its own anyway with no effort on your part.)

BTW, this is a regression between gpgme1.0 1.1.2-2 and 1.1.2-3; I believe
the cause is the re-rolled '10_relibtoolize.patch', which AFAICS there was
no reason to change in a security update.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/



Bug#415233: gpgme1.0: FTBFS: Can't find GNU Pth

2007-03-22 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:13:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
 Hi José Carlos,
 
 FWIW I'm not content with the implemented solution as far as inclusion in
 etch is concerned.  Previous versions of the package clearly did not need
 libpth20, the new version does and the effect on the package's behavior as a
 result of this new library dep seem to be unknown.


 Basically I agree, but due to time constrains I didn't have to check or
 apply other way to build it. Anayway, as it generates different .so
 files for each library, I didn't think that it would imply a problem
 for etch.

 The package also includes this change:
 
 @@ -5,9 +5,6 @@
  # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode.
  #export DH_VERBOSE=1
 
 -# This is the debhelper compatability version to use.
 -export DH_COMPAT=3
 -
  # C compiler information
  CC  = gcc
  CFLAGS  = -Wall -g
 
 This is a behavior change from the previous version of the package, because
 DH_COMPAT takes precedence over debian/compat, so this is very much not a
 change that's suitable during a freeze.
 

  Mmmm. I made that change, but I though that I had rolled it back
  later.

 So unless the security team overrules me, I don't think this version of the
 package should be allowed into etch as-is.
 
 (It's also currently held out of etch because it depends on the
 security-fixed gnupg which is not yet available, but that problem should
 clear up on its own anyway with no effort on your part.)
 
 BTW, this is a regression between gpgme1.0 1.1.2-2 and 1.1.2-3; I believe
 the cause is the re-rolled '10_relibtoolize.patch', which AFAICS there was
 no reason to change in a security update.

  The only reason is that the package was not able to build without that
  rehashed 10_relibtoolize patch. I will try again tonight to build the
  package with the older patch, perhaps it was a problem on my side
  only.

  BTW, if you want make any test, you can find my repo at
  http://svn.tribulaciones.org

  Thanks

-- 
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#415233: gpgme1.0: FTBFS: Can't find GNU Pth

2007-03-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 01:23:43AM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
 
   Hi,
 
   I don't know why this didn't happen in my i386 pbuilder also. Perhaps
 there is some other package dependeing on libpth-dev in i386 but not in
 other arches 

This seems to be a difference in the configure script.  It used to not
complain about it, now it does.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#415233: gpgme1.0: FTBFS: Can't find GNU Pth

2007-03-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 12:10:25PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
 On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 01:23:43AM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
  
Hi,
  
I don't know why this didn't happen in my i386 pbuilder also. Perhaps
  there is some other package dependeing on libpth-dev in i386 but not in
  other arches 
 
 This seems to be a difference in the configure script.  It used to not
 complain about it, now it does.

So, on atleast some arches, you used to have:
./usr/lib/libgpgme.so.11.6.1
./usr/lib/libgpgme-pthread.so.11.6.1

Now you have:
./usr/lib/libgpgme-pth.so.11.6.1
./usr/lib/libgpgme-pthread.so.11.6.1
./usr/lib/libgpgme.so.11.6.1


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#415233: gpgme1.0: FTBFS: Can't find GNU Pth

2007-03-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: gpgme1.0
Version: 1.1.2-3
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
checking for GNU Pth... *FAILED*
 ++
 | Unable to locate GNU Pth in any system-wide location (see $PATH).
 | Please specify the correct path to either a GNU Pth installation tree
 | (use --with-pth=DIR if you used --prefix=DIR for installing GNU Pth in
 | the past) or to a GNU Pth source tree (use --with-pth=DIR if DIR is a
 | path to a pth-X.Y.Z/ directory; but make sure the package is already
 | built, i.e., the configure; make step was already performed there).
 ++
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#415233: gpgme1.0: FTBFS: Can't find GNU Pth

2007-03-17 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo

  Hi,

  I don't know why this didn't happen in my i386 pbuilder also. Perhaps
there is some other package dependeing on libpth-dev in i386 but not in
other arches 



El sáb, 17-03-2007 a las 12:24 +0100, Kurt Roeckx escribió:
 Package: gpgme1.0
 Version: 1.1.2-3
 Severity: serious
 
 Hi,
 
 Your package is failing to build with the following error:
 checking for GNU Pth... *FAILED*
  ++
  | Unable to locate GNU Pth in any system-wide location (see $PATH).
  | Please specify the correct path to either a GNU Pth installation tree
  | (use --with-pth=DIR if you used --prefix=DIR for installing GNU Pth in
  | the past) or to a GNU Pth source tree (use --with-pth=DIR if DIR is a
  | path to a pth-X.Y.Z/ directory; but make sure the package is already
  | built, i.e., the configure; make step was already performed there).
  ++
 make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1
 
 
 Kurt
 
 
-- 
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]