Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos
Am Sonntag, den 06.01.2008, 19:44 +0100 schrieb Filippo Giunchedi: > what is the status of this bug? Any change RTAI can be compiled with >= > 2.6.18 ? RTAI upstream has patches up to and including 2.6.24, so it's still a matter of packaging all that sanely. -Malte -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos
Hi, On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:44:01PM +0100, Edelhard Becker wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:24:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Edelhard, do you have any objection to dropping this package from testing > > immediately given the lack of support for linux 2.6.18? > > no, just drop it and i'll try to get it into lenny as suggested. I > hope we have more luck with the combination of Debian kernel and RTAI > patches then ... what is the status of this bug? Any change RTAI can be compiled with >= 2.6.18 ? filippo -- Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net PGP key: 0x6B79D401 random quote follows: Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. -- Edsger Dijkstra signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:44:01PM +0100, Edelhard Becker wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:24:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Edelhard, do you have any objection to dropping this package from testing > > immediately given the lack of support for linux 2.6.18? > no, just drop it and i'll try to get it into lenny as suggested. I > hope we have more luck with the combination of Debian kernel and RTAI > patches then ... Ok, tagged for removal from testing, thanks. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos
Hi, On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:24:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Edelhard, do you have any objection to dropping this package from testing > immediately given the lack of support for linux 2.6.18? no, just drop it and i'll try to get it into lenny as suggested. I hope we have more luck with the combination of Debian kernel and RTAI patches then ... Greetings, Edelhard -- ~ ~ :wq signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:11:40PM +0100, Malte Cornils wrote: > > And the answer is, yes, the kernel-patch-adeos generated from the rtai > > source only supports kernels up to 2.6.8... > And besides, I tried to get 2.6.18 support [1] from upstream for etch, but > upstream does not care much [2] about 2.6.18 and only supports 2.6.17 and > 2.6.19 (because it would be difficult to support 2.6.18 due to half-done > changes to the interrupt handling there). > In essence, I'd advocate dropping RTAI for etch, too (it might make a > comeback > in early lenny-testing days). :-( Thanks for the input. Edelhard, do you have any objection to dropping this package from testing immediately given the lack of support for linux 2.6.18? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:10:46 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > And the answer is, yes, the kernel-patch-adeos generated from the rtai > source only supports kernels up to 2.6.8... And besides, I tried to get 2.6.18 support [1] from upstream for etch, but upstream does not care much [2] about 2.6.18 and only supports 2.6.17 and 2.6.19 (because it would be difficult to support 2.6.18 due to half-done changes to the interrupt handling there). In essence, I'd advocate dropping RTAI for etch, too (it might make a comeback in early lenny-testing days). :-( Good luck with the release, -Malte [1] https://mail.rtai.org/pipermail/rtai/2007-February/016592.html [2] https://mail.rtai.org/pipermail/rtai/2007-February/016593.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:42:05PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > But then the question is whether the rtai source package is affected by bug > #378967 as well. If it isn't, then getting a working kernel-patch-adeos > back into etch is as simple as binNMUing rtai for the archs in question; if > it is, then it seems likely that rtai as a whole would need to be dropped > from etch. And the answer is, yes, the kernel-patch-adeos generated from the rtai source only supports kernels up to 2.6.8... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:42:07AM +, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Package: rtai-source > Version: 3.1.0-4 > Severity: grave > > According to README.Debian: > > The Debian rtai source package currently provides four packages, > > 1) rtai-source, which provides the source for the kernel modules, some > utility binaries, the userspace libraries (LXRT) and the testsuite. RTAIs > all-in-one packaging makes it very hard to split it into separate packages. > Nevertheless i'm planning to cut off the usual librtai and -dev package and > at least rtai-utils. > 2) kernel-patch-adeos, which is necessary to compile and, of course, run the > stuff from 1) > The binary package kernel-patch-adeos was previously built by rtai, as > the README says, but is now (in sid) built by adeos, which was removed > from Etch due to an RC bug. kernel-patch-adeos is no more > in Etch, so it should not be possible to compile or run rtai-source from > Etch. On the contrary, kernel-patch-adeos is still in etch for mips and mipsel, because the kernel-patch-adeos source package was never built there so never overwrote the binaries from the rtai source. But then the question is whether the rtai source package is affected by bug #378967 as well. If it isn't, then getting a working kernel-patch-adeos back into etch is as simple as binNMUing rtai for the archs in question; if it is, then it seems likely that rtai as a whole would need to be dropped from etch. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415651: requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos
Package: rtai-source Version: 3.1.0-4 Severity: grave According to README.Debian: The Debian rtai source package currently provides four packages, 1) rtai-source, which provides the source for the kernel modules, some utility binaries, the userspace libraries (LXRT) and the testsuite. RTAIs all-in-one packaging makes it very hard to split it into separate packages. Nevertheless i'm planning to cut off the usual librtai and -dev package and at least rtai-utils. 2) kernel-patch-adeos, which is necessary to compile and, of course, run the stuff from 1) The binary package kernel-patch-adeos was previously built by rtai, as the README says, but is now (in sid) built by adeos, which was removed from Etch due to an RC bug. kernel-patch-adeos is no more in Etch, so it should not be possible to compile or run rtai-source from Etch. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
