Processed: Re: Bug#418473 closed by Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty)

2007-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reopen 418473
Bug#418473: /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

 retitle 418473 cdrecord: improper migration of directory to a symlink
Bug#418473: /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty
Changed Bug title to cdrecord: improper migration of directory to a symlink 
from /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty.

 tags 418473 etch
Bug#418473: cdrecord: improper migration of directory to a symlink
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#418473: closed by Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty)

2007-04-14 Thread Steve Langasek
reopen 418473
retitle 418473 cdrecord: improper migration of directory to a symlink
tags 418473 etch
thanks

On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:59:52PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:

  Since cdrecord depends on wodim, from the same source package, it can
  simply ship a symlink from /usr/share/doc/cdrecord to wodim.
  
  That's precisely what it does.
 
 H.  Looking at the contents of a freshly-downloaded cdrecord deb, it
 does appear to ship a symlink.  However, on my system, I have:
 
 $ ls -ld /usr/share/doc/cdrecord
 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2006-09-07 21:01 /usr/share/doc/cdrecord
 
 The same appears to hold true for the doc directories in the couple of
 other packages I filed bugs on.

 I have not done anything unusual here.  I had the non-dummy packages installed
 at one point, and later upgraded to the dummy packages.  Have I perhaps run
 afoul of some bug concerning the replacement of a directory with a symlink?

Yes, the cdrecord package previously shipped /usr/share/doc/cdrecord as a
directory, and does not correctly handle the upgrade -- which IIRC involves
rm -rf'ing the directory in the preinst of the new package version, so that
the symlink can be correctly created in the unpack stage.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#418473: closed by Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty)

2007-04-09 Thread Josh Triplett
[Resending with Steve in the CC list.]

 Since cdrecord depends on wodim, from the same source package, it can
 simply ship a symlink from /usr/share/doc/cdrecord to wodim.
 
 That's precisely what it does.

H.  Looking at the contents of a freshly-downloaded cdrecord deb, it does 
appear to ship a symlink.  However, on my system, I have:

$ ls -ld /usr/share/doc/cdrecord
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2006-09-07 21:01 /usr/share/doc/cdrecord

The same appears to hold true for the doc directories in the couple of other 
packages I filed bugs on.

I have not done anything unusual here.  I had the non-dummy packages installed
at one point, and later upgraded to the dummy packages.  Have I perhaps run
afoul of some bug concerning the replacement of a directory with a symlink?

- Josh Triplett




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#418473: closed by Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty)

2007-04-09 Thread Josh Triplett
 Since cdrecord depends on wodim, from the same source package, it can
 simply ship a symlink from /usr/share/doc/cdrecord to wodim.
 
 That's precisely what it does.

H.  Looking at the contents of a freshly-downloaded cdrecord deb, it does 
appear to ship a symlink.  However, on my system, I have:

$ ls -ld /usr/share/doc/cdrecord
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2006-09-07 21:01 /usr/share/doc/cdrecord

The same appears to hold true for the doc directories in the couple of other 
packages I filed bugs on.

I have not done anything unusual here.  I had the non-dummy packages installed
at one point, and later upgraded to the dummy packages.  Have I perhaps run
afoul of some bug concerning the replacement of a directory with a symlink?

- Josh Triplett



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature