On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:46:18PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Both dkim-milter and libdkim builds libdkim-dev, and libdkim0 and libdkim2
conflict too, even though the names aren't completely identical. As I
explained when dkim-milter was first packaged, I'm not completely foreign to
dropping Alt-N's libdkim altogether, but the issue should be properly
discussed first.
Somehow I'd had a brainlapse and forgotten about this issue before
uploading the new packages; entirely my fault.
If you still see value in the AltN library, I'm happy to rename my
packages (probably to something like libdkim-sendmail or libsmdkim or
the like). We'll still need to decide about library names, but I don't
see that you need to drop your packages unless they're completely
unnecessary.
--
Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're out of your mind.
That's between me and my mind.
- Simon Tam and Jubal Early, Firefly: Objects in Space
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
