Bug#444650: can you test and verify with latest glibc (libc6) installed?
fixed 444650 2.2.3-1 retitle 444650 cfagent segfaults when using IPRange(...) severity 452352 important thanks Stéphane Glondu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks alot for the testing!! Are you able to test with the newer cfengine2-package (2.2.3) e.g. from backports.org [1]? It does not segfault anymore with this new version. Great! This is really helpful. I'll also lower the severity of #452352 to 'important' as this bug doesn't affect the version in unstable (2.2.3-1). Can you also send me your cfagent.conf-file so I can try to reproduce? The segfault occurs with the attached cfagent.conf file. I have narrowed it a lot. I should have done this earlier! Great, thanks! I'll try to verify the bug in a qemu-machine. Not sure if we should try to make a patch for stable though. :/ groups: ferme = ( IPRange(10.231.136.200-210) ) I'll rename the bug then. - Werner
Processed: Re: Bug#444650: can you test and verify with latest glibc (libc6) installed?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: fixed 444650 2.2.3-1 Bug#444650: cfengine2: cfagent segfaults immediately after startup Bug marked as fixed in version 2.2.3-1. retitle 444650 cfagent segfaults when using IPRange(...) Bug#444650: cfengine2: cfagent segfaults immediately after startup Changed Bug title to `cfagent segfaults when using IPRange(...)' from `cfengine2: cfagent segfaults immediately after startup'. severity 452352 important Bug#452352: cfengine2: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `important' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#444650: can you test and verify with latest glibc (libc6) installed?
Stephane Glondu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: can you verify this bug again with the newest glibc(libc6) installed on these servers? This might be related to the problem described in #369536 or #401115. Hopefully this bug report is fixed with the update of libc6. The bug still exists with libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13etch4. Note: we do no longer use cfengine2 anymore. I've made the test with a freshly-installed cfengine2 (on the same computer). Thanks alot for the testing!! Are you able to test with the newer cfengine2-package (2.2.3) e.g. from backports.org [1]? Can you also send me your cfagent.conf-file so I can try to reproduce? - Werner [1] http://backports.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=instructions -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#444650: can you test and verify with latest glibc (libc6) installed?
Morten Werner Forsbring a écrit : Thanks alot for the testing!! Are you able to test with the newer cfengine2-package (2.2.3) e.g. from backports.org [1]? It does not segfault anymore with this new version. Can you also send me your cfagent.conf-file so I can try to reproduce? The segfault occurs with the attached cfagent.conf file. I have narrowed it a lot. I should have done this earlier! -- Stéphane Glondu groups: ferme = ( IPRange(10.231.136.200-210) )
Bug#444650: can you test and verify with latest glibc (libc6) installed?
Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2008 21:34:30 schrieb Stéphane Glondu: Morten Werner Forsbring a écrit : Thanks alot for the testing!! Are you able to test with the newer cfengine2-package (2.2.3) e.g. from backports.org [1]? It does not segfault anymore with this new version. Mh.. this means this is fixed by new glibc and new cfengine2 package. Morton what do you think? I'll try to reproduce it with the attached cfagent.conf file and report after. Can you also send me your cfagent.conf-file so I can try to reproduce? The segfault occurs with the attached cfagent.conf file. I have narrowed it a lot. I should have done this earlier! Thanks for your work Greetings Winnie -- .''`. Patrick Winnertz [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : GNU/Linux Debian Developer `. `'` http://www.der-winnie.de http://d.skolelinux.org/~winnie `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#444650: can you test and verify with latest glibc (libc6) installed?
Hello, can you verify this bug again with the newest glibc(libc6) installed on these servers? This might be related to the problem described in #369536 or #401115. Hopefully this bug report is fixed with the update of libc6. Greetings Patrick Winnertz -- .''`. Patrick Winnertz [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : GNU/Linux Debian Developer `. `'` http://www.der-winnie.de http://d.skolelinux.org/~winnie `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#444650: can you test and verify with latest glibc (libc6) installed?
Patrick Winnertz wrote: can you verify this bug again with the newest glibc(libc6) installed on these servers? This might be related to the problem described in #369536 or #401115. Hopefully this bug report is fixed with the update of libc6. The bug still exists with libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13etch4. Note: we do no longer use cfengine2 anymore. I've made the test with a freshly-installed cfengine2 (on the same computer). -- Stéphane Glondu
