Bug#444724: tmda: should this package be removed?

2008-01-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 444724 normal
reassign 444724 ftp.debian.org
retitle 444724 RM: tmda -- RoQA; unmaintained, useless
thanks

On 30/09/07 at 16:36 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
 Package: tmda
 Version: 1.0.3-1.1
 Severity: serious
 User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Usertags: proposed-removal
 
 Hi,
 
 While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package
 came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because:
 
  * Upstream doesn't want TMDA to be included in a stable release.
  * The package is outdated, there's a 1.1.12 release available from
tmda.net
  * last maintainer upload in 2004
  * there are probably better alternatives, for which the maintainer
doesn't object to inclusion in stable releases
  * only 18 popcon insts

The situation didn't change. Requesting removal.
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#444724: tmda: should this package be removed?

2008-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 444724 normal
Bug#444724: tmda: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'

 reassign 444724 ftp.debian.org
Bug#444724: tmda: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `tmda' to `ftp.debian.org'.

 retitle 444724 RM: tmda -- RoQA; unmaintained, useless
Bug#444724: tmda: should this package be removed?
Changed Bug title to `RM: tmda -- RoQA; unmaintained, useless' from `tmda: 
should this package be removed?'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#444724: tmda: should this package be removed?

2007-11-29 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
close 444724 -1
reassign -1 wnpp
severity -1 normal
retitle -1 O: tmda -- Tagged Message Delivery Agent
thanks

On 30/09/07 at 16:36 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
 Package: tmda
 Version: 1.0.3-1.1
 Severity: serious
 User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Usertags: proposed-removal
 
 Hi,
 
 While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package
 came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because:

Hi,

Since the situation hasn't evolved, I am now orphaning this package.  I
still plan to request its removal in the near future, but this orphaning
could allow someone to adopt the package if appropriate.

Please reply to this bug report if you feel that this package shouldn't
be removed.

Please also reply if you think that this package _should_ be removed, as
this will allow to make the process quicker.

Thank you,
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#444724: tmda: should this package be removed?

2007-09-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: tmda
Version: 1.0.3-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal

Hi,

While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package
came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because:

 * Upstream doesn't want TMDA to be included in a stable release.
 * The package is outdated, there's a 1.1.12 release available from
   tmda.net
 * last maintainer upload in 2004
 * there are probably better alternatives, for which the maintainer
   doesn't object to inclusion in stable releases
 * only 18 popcon insts

If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from
Debian, please reply to this bug and tell so.

If you agree, sending the following commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
should do it (after replacing nn with this bug's number):
severity nn normal
reassign nn ftp.debian.org
retitle nn RM: packagename -- RoM; reasons 
thanks

For more information, see
http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt

If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please
just close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other
issues.

Thank you,

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]