Bug#450711:

2008-03-04 Thread Jos





On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 03:56:41PM +0100, Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
I'm sorry that it took this long to respond, I'm like most of us, not 
enough time to do what I want.

I tested 2.4.4., but its still terminate.
in the log
Mar  3 15:46:22 kast dkim-filter[29146]: Sendmail DKIM Filter: mi_stop=1
Mar  3 15:46:23 kast dkim-filter[29146]: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.0.2 
terminating with status 0, errno = 32

Mar  3 15:46:26 kast dkim-filter[29140]: Sendmail DKIM Filter: mi_stop=1
Mar  3 15:46:26 kast dkim-filter[29140]: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.0.2 
terminating with status 0, errno = 0


So there is still a problem.



That's showing 2.0.2 still?
  

I didn't notice that, sorry.
It seems that somehow when I removed 2.0.2. the process was not 
killed??.  So I thought 2.4.4 was running.

I killed the process, and now 2.4.4 is running without any errors.

Mike, thank you for all the good work.

Jos



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711: marked as done (fails to start with can't initialize DKIM library)

2008-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:49:16 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#450711:
has caused the Debian Bug report #450711,
regarding fails to start with can't initialize DKIM library
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
450711: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=450711
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: dkim-filter
Version: 2.0.2.dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

dkim-filter(2.3.2.dfsg-1) fails to start with settings that works with 
version2.0.2.dfsg-1.
Only message is in syslog: dkim-filter[26391]:can't initialize DKIM library..
Settings are checked and are valid for version 2.3.2.dfsg-1.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-486
Locale: LANG=nl_NL, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages dkim-filter depends on:
ii  adduser   3.102  Add and remove users and groups
ii  libc6 2.6.1-1+b1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdb4.5  4.5.20-11  Berkeley v4.5 Database Libraries [
ii  libmilter18.14.1-9   Sendmail Mail Filter API (Milter)
ii  libssl0.9.8   0.9.8g-1   SSL shared libraries

dkim-filter recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 02:50:59PM +0100, Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 That's showing 2.0.2 still?
   
 I didn't notice that, sorry.
 It seems that somehow when I removed 2.0.2. the process was not 
 killed??.  So I thought 2.4.4 was running.
 I killed the process, and now 2.4.4 is running without any errors.
 
 Mike, thank you for all the good work.

Great news.

-- 
Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---End Message---


Bug#450711: Bugtracker error

2008-03-03 Thread Jos
I'm sorry that it took this long to respond, I'm like most of us, not 
enough time to do what I want.

I tested 2.4.4., but its still terminate.
in the log
Mar  3 15:46:22 kast dkim-filter[29146]: Sendmail DKIM Filter: mi_stop=1
Mar  3 15:46:23 kast dkim-filter[29146]: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.0.2 
terminating with status 0, errno = 32

Mar  3 15:46:26 kast dkim-filter[29140]: Sendmail DKIM Filter: mi_stop=1
Mar  3 15:46:26 kast dkim-filter[29140]: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.0.2 
terminating with status 0, errno = 0


So there is still a problem.

Jos


Mike Markley schreef:

On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 02:52:58AM -0800, Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  

On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 11:29:27AM +0100, Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The last mail including the requested files, I've send it to both you 
and the BTS
  

I didn't get them, either, and I'm not running any software in common
with the BTS... strange.

You may as well try with 2.4.4, since I've now uploaded it.



Have you had a chance to try this? I'd really like to get this resolved,
as it's been blocking dkim-milter from testing for quite some time.

  




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711: Bugtracker error

2008-02-10 Thread Jos
The last mail including the requested files, I've send it to both you 
and the BTS


Mike Markley schreef:

On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:41:07AM +0100, Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
I send the requested files 3 times, but got no confirmation from the 
bugtracker.

Maybe a spamfilter is blocking the mail?



Are you sending it just to the BTS, or to both me and the BTS?

  




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711: Bugtracker error

2008-02-09 Thread Mike Markley
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:41:07AM +0100, Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I send the requested files 3 times, but got no confirmation from the 
 bugtracker.
 Maybe a spamfilter is blocking the mail?

Are you sending it just to the BTS, or to both me and the BTS?

-- 
Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I THINK THEY SHOULD CONTINUE the policy of not giving a Nobel Prize for
paneling.
- Jack Handey, The New Mexican, 1988.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711: Bugtracker error

2008-02-08 Thread Jos
I send the requested files 3 times, but got no confirmation from the 
bugtracker.

Maybe a spamfilter is blocking the mail?



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711:

2008-01-30 Thread Mike Markley
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 05:56:24PM +0100, Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Mike, did you ever received the requested info, I send dec 30?
 I don't see it in the bug tracker,

I don't see it in my maibox, either. You may want to resend.

-- 
Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

There's another way to survive.  Mutual trust -- and help.
- Kirk, Day of the Dove, stardate unknown



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711:

2008-01-24 Thread Jos

Mike, did you ever received the requested info, I send dec 30?
I don't see it in the bug tracker,

Jos

Mike Markley schreef:

On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:37:02PM +0100, Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

with 2.4.1, still a  can't initialize DKIM library



Then it may be a different problem; 2.4.1 should be able to handle the
empty resolv.conf. Can you grab another set of ltrace/strace output for
me?

  




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711:

2007-12-30 Thread Mike Markley
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:37:02PM +0100, Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 with 2.4.1, still a  can't initialize DKIM library

Then it may be a different problem; 2.4.1 should be able to handle the
empty resolv.conf. Can you grab another set of ltrace/strace output for
me?

-- 
Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711:

2007-12-23 Thread Jos

with 2.4.1, still a  can't initialize DKIM library

Mike Markley schreef:

Upstream fixed your specific case, and I've enabled another feature in
the software that I probably should've enabled back in 2.3.2 when
I turned on arlib. Can you test this binary with your setup?

  




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711:

2007-12-18 Thread Jos




That makes sense,
as you already must know, I'm not a linux guru.

In the resolv.conf man, 
"If no nameserver entries are present, the default is to use the name
server on the local machine."

according to other resources on the internet, resolv.conf is not even
required if named is running.

On localhost named is running, and a nslookup gives a correct result.

The line in my resolv.conf does not make any sense, so I removed the
resolv.conf.
This didn't solved the error, so I created a resolv.conf with the line
"nameserver 83.80.1.236" (the ip of the
ISP nameserver)
Still the same error "can't initialize DKIM library" in syslog.

I'm confused, is this a config problem?
If so, why does I never had and have any other problems with ip/name
resolving.

Jos

Mike Markley schreef:

  On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:31:12PM +0100, Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
   with bind9.
   the server has the name "kast".

  
  
Ah. I'm afraid that's not how resolv.conf works. "search" simply
specifies a list of domains under which to search for hosts. So, for
example, if you attempted to look up a host simply called "foo", the
resolver would try resolving just "foo", then "foo.kast".

That keyword has no bearing on where lookups are performed. Your system
still needs "nameserver" entries so it knows what name server(s) to
actually query. Upstream has dug into the resolver functions a bit and
confirmed that this behavior would occur on a system with no nameservers
available.

  






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711:

2007-12-17 Thread Jos

Only one line

search kast

Mike Markley schreef:

Aside from the updated deb, can I see your resolv.conf?

  




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711:

2007-12-17 Thread Mike Markley
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:08:07AM +0100, Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 search kast

How do you do name resolution?

-- 
Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711:

2007-12-17 Thread Jos




with bind9.
the server has the name "kast".


Mike Markley schreef:

  On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:08:07AM +0100, Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
search kast

  
  
How do you do name resolution?

  






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711:

2007-12-17 Thread Mike Markley
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:31:12PM +0100, Jos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with bind9.
the server has the name kast.

Ah. I'm afraid that's not how resolv.conf works. search simply
specifies a list of domains under which to search for hosts. So, for
example, if you attempted to look up a host simply called foo, the
resolver would try resolving just foo, then foo.kast.

That keyword has no bearing on where lookups are performed. Your system
still needs nameserver entries so it knows what name server(s) to
actually query. Upstream has dug into the resolver functions a bit and
confirmed that this behavior would occur on a system with no nameservers
available.

-- 
Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711: bug 450711

2007-12-08 Thread Jos
Disable the arlib support did the trick.  I'm running the test version 
without any problems.

Do you  reccoment to stay with this test version, or to downgrade to 2.0.2.?

Jos



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711: bug 450711

2007-12-07 Thread Jos
I'm sorry to inform you, that with version 2.4.0. the problem still 
persists.

So I'm back to version 2.0.2

Jos



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711:

2007-12-06 Thread Mike Markley
Hi Jos,

I've been unable to make heads or tails of this issue, so I'd like you
to try with the 2.4.0 package I've just rolled. I'm uploading it
tonight, but I can send you an i386 deb out-of-band if you'd like to try
before it hits the mirrors. Just let me know.

Also, do you mind if I attach the config and trace files you sent me to
this bug report? That would be very helpful if I'm unable to make any
headway and I ask upstream to take a look.

Thanks,

-- 
Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Elliptic paraboloids for sale.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711:

2007-12-06 Thread Jos

Hi Mike,
please send send me the 2.4.0 deb. I wil try is asap.
It's oke to attach the config and trace files, but please remove any
privacy related info, like the domainname, from the files.
I don't want to increase the spam to this domain.
Keep up the good work

Jos

Mike Markley schreef:

Hi Jos,

I've been unable to make heads or tails of this issue, so I'd like you
to try with the 2.4.0 package I've just rolled. I'm uploading it
tonight, but I can send you an i386 deb out-of-band if you'd like to try
before it hits the mirrors. Just let me know.

Also, do you mind if I attach the config and trace files you sent me to
this bug report? That would be very helpful if I'm unable to make any
headway and I ask upstream to take a look.

Thanks,

  





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711: dkim-filter(2.3.2.dfsg-1) fails to start with settings that works with version2.0.2.dfsg-1. Only message is in syslog dkim-filter[26391]: can't initialize DKIM library.. Settings are che

2007-11-09 Thread Jos Zonneveld
Package: dkim-filter
Version: 2.0.2.dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

dkim-filter(2.3.2.dfsg-1) fails to start with settings that works with 
version2.0.2.dfsg-1.
Only message is in syslog: dkim-filter[26391]:can't initialize DKIM library..
Settings are checked and are valid for version 2.3.2.dfsg-1.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-486
Locale: LANG=nl_NL, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages dkim-filter depends on:
ii  adduser   3.102  Add and remove users and groups
ii  libc6 2.6.1-1+b1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdb4.5  4.5.20-11  Berkeley v4.5 Database Libraries [
ii  libmilter18.14.1-9   Sendmail Mail Filter API (Milter)
ii  libssl0.9.8   0.9.8g-1   SSL shared libraries

dkim-filter recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450711: dkim-filter(2.3.2.dfsg-1) fails to start with settings that works with version2.0.2.dfsg-1. Only message is in syslog dkim-filter[26391]: can't initialize DKIM library.. Settings are che

2007-11-09 Thread Mike Markley
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 03:23:54PM +0100, Jos Zonneveld [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 dkim-filter(2.3.2.dfsg-1) fails to start with settings that works with 
 version2.0.2.dfsg-1.
 Only message is in syslog: dkim-filter[26391]:can't initialize DKIM 
 library..
 Settings are checked and are valid for version 2.3.2.dfsg-1.

... What exactly are those settings? Can you send your
/etc/default/dkim-filter and /etc/dkim-filter.conf (and any other
associated files)?

-- 
Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]