Processed: Re: Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456679 normal Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456679 wnpp Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `pam-pgsql' to `wnpp'. > retitle 456679 O: pam-pgsql -- PAM module to authenticate using a PostgreSQL > database Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned? Changed Bug title to `O: pam-pgsql -- PAM module to authenticate using a PostgreSQL database' from `pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned?'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned?
severity 456679 normal reassign 456679 wnpp retitle 456679 O: pam-pgsql -- PAM module to authenticate using a PostgreSQL database thanks On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:50:54PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that > should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: [...] Considering that this caused a removal from testing, I am now stepping up to orphan this package. Please be aware that Ubuntu packaged something they call a new "upstream" version. It could possibly be investigated for a new upload. Rationale for orphanage: I was never able to get a reliable means of communication with the current maintainer of the package and he was unable to come up with an upload to sponsor. And there was no reaction by the Debian maintainer nowadays, at all. The reassignment of this bug will put this package back into testing. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Debian Release Assistant `. `' xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `-finger pkern/[EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned?
Hello *, Am 2007-12-25 11:40:09, schrieb Philipp Kern: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:50:54PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > > If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being > > orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so. > > Just for the record: I do not agree with the removal of this package. > > Kind regards, > Philipp Kern - END OF REPLIED MESSAGE - I second this since I use it on all of my own (146) and customers (over 2300) machines... Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi 0033/6/6192519367100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned?
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:50:54PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being > orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so. Just for the record: I do not agree with the removal of this package. Kind regards, Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned?
Package: pam-pgsql Version: 0.5.2-9.3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * maintainer seems not active * no upload maintainer since long If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so. If you agree that it should be orphaned, sending the following commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should do it (after replacing nn with this bug's number): severity nn normal reassign nn wnpp retitle nn O: -- thanks For more information, see http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-archive-manip http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other issues. Thank you, filippo -- Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net PGP key: 0x6B79D401 random quote follows: Beauty isn't worth thinking about; what's important is your mind. You don't want a fifty-dollar haircut on a fifty-cent head. -- Garrison Keillor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
