Bug#484599: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#484599: ia32-libs contains several sources and break policy 4.13

2008-07-27 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 12:04:39PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
 severity 484599 important
 tags 484599 wontfix
 thanks
If you want this to work, you need to send to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
too.

 
 Hi!
 
 May I ask you for the motivation to open this bug? 
 
 On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 07:44:50AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
  ia32-libs contains several sources of software that are already packaged
  and available from the Debian archive.
  [...]
  None of the software contained into ia32-libs are intended to be
  packaged this way.
 
 There are only 2 ways of dealing with this: 
 
 - fix multiarch blockers (binutils) and finish the implementation (not
   for lenny anymore, sorry)
 
 - implement biarch like RedHat and SuSE did, putting all 64bit libs to
   /lib64 and 32bit libs to /lib, and patching dpkg et all to cope with
   this, allowing amd64 to install both amd64 and i386 packages (no way,
   sorry - 4 years too late for this)
 
 But opening RC bugs pointing to the obvious mess doesn't help neither our 
 users nor my blood pressure.
 
 Regards
 Frederik Schüler
 
 -- 
 ENOSIG




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#484599: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#484599: ia32-libs contains several sources and break policy 4.13

2008-06-05 Thread Frederik Schueler
severity 484599 important
tags 484599 wontfix
thanks

Hi!

May I ask you for the motivation to open this bug? 

On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 07:44:50AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
 ia32-libs contains several sources of software that are already packaged
 and available from the Debian archive.
 [...]
 None of the software contained into ia32-libs are intended to be
 packaged this way.

There are only 2 ways of dealing with this: 

- fix multiarch blockers (binutils) and finish the implementation (not
  for lenny anymore, sorry)

- implement biarch like RedHat and SuSE did, putting all 64bit libs to
  /lib64 and 32bit libs to /lib, and patching dpkg et all to cope with
  this, allowing amd64 to install both amd64 and i386 packages (no way,
  sorry - 4 years too late for this)

But opening RC bugs pointing to the obvious mess doesn't help neither our 
users nor my blood pressure.

Regards
Frederik Schüler

-- 
ENOSIG


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature