Bug#497434: debian/copyright lacking

2008-09-02 Thread Thomas Viehmann

On 2008-09-01 22:35:55.00 Tim Riker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Note: the mentioned fonts are NOT included in this package.
None the less, I'll expand the mention of the copyright on the  
fonts that I'm NOT including.

You have fonts in both source tarballs and ship them in
/usr/share/bzflag/fonts/
is nonempty in both the testing bzflag and the unstable bzflag-data  
package.
(I'll not discuss that you shouldn't be shipping these fonts anyways  
but just find them on the system it runs on.)
Surely, these fonts have copyright attached to them and hopefully  
some license.


Now that I had to look at your packaging again: your -data-package  
misses Replaces/Conflicts with the old bzflag package, too, breaking  
upgrades, but that would be another serious bug to file.


Kind regards

T.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#497434: debian/copyright lacking

2008-09-02 Thread Tim Riker

Thomas Viehmann wrote:

On 2008-09-01 22:35:55.00 Tim Riker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Note: the mentioned fonts are NOT included in this package.
None the less, I'll expand the mention of the copyright on the fonts 
that I'm NOT including.

You have fonts in both source tarballs and ship them in
/usr/share/bzflag/fonts/
is nonempty in both the testing bzflag and the unstable bzflag-data 
package.
(I'll not discuss that you shouldn't be shipping these fonts anyways but 
just find them on the system it runs on.)
Surely, these fonts have copyright attached to them and hopefully some 
license.


I presume you mean the png image files? These are not fonts, but images.

Fonts would have a ttf extension. Don't you agree?

Now that I had to look at your packaging again: your -data-package 
misses Replaces/Conflicts with the old bzflag package, too, breaking 
upgrades, but that would be another serious bug to file.


See bug #497520

--
Tim Riker - http://Rikers.org/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Embedded Linux Technologist - http://eLinux.org/
BZFlag maintainer - http://BZFlag.org/ - for fun!
☢ ☛ ¿ǝʇɐɔıʇǝu pooƃ ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ɹnoʎ uı 8-ɟʇn sı ☚ ☢



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#497434: debian/copyright lacking

2008-09-02 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Tim Riker wrote:
 Thomas Viehmann wrote:
 On 2008-09-01 22:35:55.00 Tim Riker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Note: the mentioned fonts are NOT included in this package.
 None the less, I'll expand the mention of the copyright on the fonts
 that I'm NOT including.
 You have fonts in both source tarballs and ship them in
 /usr/share/bzflag/fonts/
 is nonempty in both the testing bzflag and the unstable bzflag-data
 package.

 (I'll not discuss that you shouldn't be shipping these fonts anyways
 but just find them on the system it runs on.)
In the parantheses, I was indeed confused.

 Surely, these fonts have copyright attached to them and hopefully some
 license.

 I presume you mean the png image files? These are not fonts, but images.
 Fonts would have a ttf extension. Don't you agree?

No. The fact that you use a bitmap representation of (the most common
chars of) the font stored in an image doesn't change the fact that you
are essentially shipping a version of the font and need to abide by its
license and document copyright and license in debian/copyright. This is
also borderline w.r.t. the requirement that everything in Debian must be
built from source to be shipped in the .deb.

 Now that I had to look at your packaging again: your -data-package
 misses Replaces/Conflicts with the old bzflag package, too, breaking
 upgrades, but that would be another serious bug to file.

 See bug #497520

Indeed.

Kind regards

T.
-- 
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#497434: debian/copyright lacking

2008-09-01 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Package: bzflag
Version: 2.0.10.20071115+nmu1
Severity: serious

Hi Tim,

the your debian/copyright is lacking. It needs to list all
copyright/licensing information related to your package. In particular,
you need to list the fonts copyright notice and license.

Kind regards

T.
-- 
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#497434: debian/copyright lacking

2008-09-01 Thread Tim Riker

Note: the mentioned fonts are NOT included in this package.

None the less, I'll expand the mention of the copyright on the fonts 
that I'm NOT including.

--
Tim Riker - http://Rikers.org/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Embedded Linux Technologist - http://eLinux.org/
BZFlag maintainer - http://BZFlag.org/ - for fun!
☢ ☛ ¿ǝʇɐɔıʇǝu pooƃ ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ɹnoʎ uı 8-ɟʇn sı ☚ ☢



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]