Bug#536676: plink: FTBFS on MIPS.
severity 536676 important thanks Since there is no plink package in testing for MIPS, this bug is not a regression, so I set the severity to important accordingly… -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536676: plink: FTBFS on MIPS.
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 13:19 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:40:48AM -0700, David Daney a écrit : > > > > Can you file a bug report as per GCC bug reporting guidelines: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html > > Hi David, > > I wanted to build plink on the MIPS Debian porter box, but could not find vi, > emacs, nano or joe in the sid dchroot to modify the upstream Makefile in order > to pass ‘-v -save-temps’ to g++. Generally, editors are installed on the host rather than in each chroot. In the specific case of mahler (the MIPS porter box) the host has vi, emacs and nano. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536676: plink: FTBFS on MIPS.
Le Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:40:48AM -0700, David Daney a écrit : > > Can you file a bug report as per GCC bug reporting guidelines: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html Hi David, I wanted to build plink on the MIPS Debian porter box, but could not find vi, emacs, nano or joe in the sid dchroot to modify the upstream Makefile in order to pass ‘-v -save-temps’ to g++. I hope that somebody on the debian-mips mailing list with better knowledge of GCC and the Debian porting infractructure can help you to get more information about this bug. I updated the Debian plink package to use -O2, but it did not circumvent the bug. Nevertheless, the build logs are also more verbose. https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=plink;ver=1.06-4;arch=mips;stamp=1247627291 Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536676: plink: FTBFS on MIPS.
Charles Plessy wrote: Le Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:01:34AM +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : Charles Plessy wrote: How about trying to separate the issues of having a bug in GCC and having a package that does not build on MIPS? I noticed that the package is built with -O3, which probably unnecessary. Can somebody try to build plink with -O2 on MIPS to see if it escapes the bug? The following patch in debian/rules would to the job: You do know that you can try this yourself on mahler.d.o, right? Sure, but since plink seems to be fine on other architectures, this bug seems more relevant to MIPS than to plink. I do not think that anybody on Earth is interested to use plink on MIPS. So if it helped you to find a MIPS-relevant bug, I am happy, but if you (the MIPS porters) are not interested in solving it, I would rather not distribute this package on MIPS than accept the responsibility for managing a GCC bug, which is completely outside my field of competence. Said differently, if this bug is zero fun for everybody let's find a solution that allow us to focus on what we care the most. Can you file a bug report as per GCC bug reporting guidelines: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html We will try to fix it if it affects current GCC versions. Especially helpful would be preprocessed source and the exact command line flags used. Thanks, David Daney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536676: plink: FTBFS on MIPS.
Le Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:01:34AM +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : > Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > How about trying to separate the issues of having a bug in GCC and having a > > package that does not build on MIPS? I noticed that the package is built > > with > > -O3, which probably unnecessary. Can somebody try to build plink with -O2 on > > MIPS to see if it escapes the bug? The following patch in debian/rules > > would to > > the job: > > You do know that you can try this yourself on mahler.d.o, right? Sure, but since plink seems to be fine on other architectures, this bug seems more relevant to MIPS than to plink. I do not think that anybody on Earth is interested to use plink on MIPS. So if it helped you to find a MIPS-relevant bug, I am happy, but if you (the MIPS porters) are not interested in solving it, I would rather not distribute this package on MIPS than accept the responsibility for managing a GCC bug, which is completely outside my field of competence. Said differently, if this bug is zero fun for everybody let's find a solution that allow us to focus on what we care the most. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536676: plink: FTBFS on MIPS.
Charles Plessy wrote: > Package: plink > Version: 1.06-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: no longer builds from source > > thanks > > > Le Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:06:21PM +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : >> Charles Plessy wrote: >>> Le Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:56:31PM +, DDPOMail robot a écrit : === plink: = Missing build(s) on mips,mipsel This might need manual action from your side. See http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=plink >>> Dear MIPS porters, >>> >>> any idea of what makes plink fail to build on mips and mipsel? >> Seems to be a bug in the compiler from a first look, lets see if a retry >> still fails. > > Thank you very much for the rebuild. It reproduced the bug :( > > How about trying to separate the issues of having a bug in GCC and having a > package that does not build on MIPS? I noticed that the package is built with > -O3, which probably unnecessary. Can somebody try to build plink with -O2 on > MIPS to see if it escapes the bug? The following patch in debian/rules would > to > the job: You do know that you can try this yourself on mahler.d.o, right? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#536676: plink: FTBFS on MIPS.
Package: plink Version: 1.06-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source thanks Le Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:06:21PM +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : > Charles Plessy wrote: > > Le Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:56:31PM +, DDPOMail robot a écrit : > >> === plink: > >> = Missing build(s) on mips,mipsel > >> This might need manual action from your side. > >> See http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=plink > > > > Dear MIPS porters, > > > > any idea of what makes plink fail to build on mips and mipsel? > > Seems to be a bug in the compiler from a first look, lets see if a retry > still fails. Thank you very much for the rebuild. It reproduced the bug :( How about trying to separate the issues of having a bug in GCC and having a package that does not build on MIPS? I noticed that the package is built with -O3, which probably unnecessary. Can somebody try to build plink with -O2 on MIPS to see if it escapes the bug? The following patch in debian/rules would to the job: --- ../plink/debian/rules 2009-07-12 18:59:28.0 +0900 +++ plink-1.06/debian/rules 2009-07-12 19:21:28.0 +0900 @@ -5,9 +5,33 @@ pkg=plink +# DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS from Policy § 4.9.1 +CXXFLAGS = -Wall -g +INSTALL = install +INSTALL_FILE= $(INSTALL) -p-o root -g root -m 644 +INSTALL_PROGRAM = $(INSTALL) -p-o root -g root -m 755 +INSTALL_SCRIPT = $(INSTALL) -p-o root -g root -m 755 +INSTALL_DIR = $(INSTALL) -p -d -o root -g root -m 755 + +ifneq (,$(filter noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) +CXXFLAGS += -O0 +else +CXXFLAGS += -O2 +endif +ifeq (,$(filter nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) +INSTALL_PROGRAM += -s +endif +ifneq (,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) +NUMJOBS = $(patsubst parallel=%,%,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) +MAKEFLAGS += -j$(NUMJOBS) +endif + +# This would be added by Upstream makefile, but we override CXXFLAGS… +CXXFLAGS += -DUNIX -DWITH_R_PLUGINS + build: patch build-stamp build-stamp: - $(MAKE) CXX_UNIX=g++ WITH_R_PLUGINS=1 + $(MAKE) CXXFLAGS='$(CXXFLAGS)' touch $@ clean: unpatch If it builds with -O2, we can upload a corrected package, and you can forward this bug on GCC if you think it is worth (which I can not judge). Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
