Bug#543573: Anybody have a spare sparc machine? (was: Re: Bug#543573: FTBFS: libdevel-declare-perl_0.005011-1 on sparc (dist=unstable))

2009-09-02 Thread Niko Tyni
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 07:52:17PM -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote:

 the upstream author of libdevel-declare-perl thinks that this could be
 the same as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505415
 so if somebody with a sparc machine could just rebuild
 libdevel-declare-perl against the perl in experimental and confirm
 that it builds, that would be sufficient.

I can confirm this.


Core was generated by `debugperl -Iblib/lib -Iblib/arch t/combi.t'.
Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error.
#0  0xf7c7dadc in S_scan_str (my_perl=value optimized out, offset=13) at 
stolen_chunk_of_toke.c:716
716 SvGROW(sv, SvCUR(sv) + (PL_bufend - s) + 1);

It works with Perl 5.10.1. A workaround for 5.10.0 is to lower the
optimization to -O1.
-- 
Niko Tyni   nt...@debian.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#543573: Anybody have a spare sparc machine? (was: Re: Bug#543573: FTBFS: libdevel-declare-perl_0.005011-1 on sparc (dist=unstable))

2009-09-02 Thread Damyan Ivanov
[dropped Ccs]

-=| Niko Tyni, Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:23:10AM +0300 |=-
 On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 07:52:17PM -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote:
 
  the upstream author of libdevel-declare-perl thinks that this could be
  the same as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505415
  so if somebody with a sparc machine could just rebuild
  libdevel-declare-perl against the perl in experimental and confirm
  that it builds, that would be sufficient.
 
 I can confirm this.
 
 
 Core was generated by `debugperl -Iblib/lib -Iblib/arch t/combi.t'.
 Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error.
 #0  0xf7c7dadc in S_scan_str (my_perl=value optimized out, offset=13) at 
 stolen_chunk_of_toke.c:716
 716 SvGROW(sv, SvCUR(sv) + (PL_bufend - s) + 1);
 
 It works with Perl 5.10.1. A workaround for 5.10.0 is to lower the
 optimization to -O1.

Is the lower optimization level required for perl or libdevel-declare-perl?

-- 
dam


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#543573: Anybody have a spare sparc machine? (was: Re: Bug#543573: FTBFS: libdevel-declare-perl_0.005011-1 on sparc (dist=unstable))

2009-09-02 Thread Niko Tyni
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 05:53:33PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:

  Core was generated by `debugperl -Iblib/lib -Iblib/arch t/combi.t'.
  Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error.
  #0  0xf7c7dadc in S_scan_str (my_perl=value optimized out, offset=13) at 
  stolen_chunk_of_toke.c:716
  716 SvGROW(sv, SvCUR(sv) + (PL_bufend - s) + 1);
  
  It works with Perl 5.10.1. A workaround for 5.10.0 is to lower the
  optimization to -O1.
 
 Is the lower optimization level required for perl or libdevel-declare-perl?

The latter. See the libjson-xs-perl debian/rules for prior art.
-- 
Niko Tyni   nt...@debian.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#543573: Anybody have a spare sparc machine? (was: Re: Bug#543573: FTBFS: libdevel-declare-perl_0.005011-1 on sparc (dist=unstable))

2009-09-01 Thread Ryan Niebur
[cross posting ftw]

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:50:38PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
  Failed Test  Stat Wstat Total Fail  List of Failed
  ---
  t/combi.t   010??   ??  ??
  t/ctx-simple.t  010??   ??  ??
  t/fail.t010??   ??  ??
  t/methinstaller-simple.t010??   ??  ??
  t/method-no-semi.t  010??   ??  ??
  t/method.t  010??   ??  ??
  t/multiline-proto.t 010 12  1
  t/sugar.t   010??   ??  ??
  1 test skipped.
  Failed 8/23 test scripts. 1/38 subtests failed.
  Files=23, Tests=38,  3 wallclock secs ( 2.76 cusr +  0.25 csys =  3.01 CPU)
  Failed 8/23 test programs. 1/38 subtests failed.
  make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
  make[1]: Leaving directory 
  `/build/buildd-libdevel-declare-perl_0.005011-1-sparc-FPppW5/libdevel-declare-perl-0.005011'
  dh_auto_test: make returned exit code 2
  make: *** [build] Error 1
  dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
 
 

This is a sparc only FTBFS, and none of us own a sparc machine. Does
anybody have a spare one they could let me (or somebody else in the
Perl group) ssh into to debug it?

Cheers,
Ryan

-- 
_
Ryan Niebur
ryanrya...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#543573: Anybody have a spare sparc machine? (was: Re: Bug#543573: FTBFS: libdevel-declare-perl_0.005011-1 on sparc (dist=unstable))

2009-09-01 Thread Ryan Niebur
Hi,

On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 07:12:47PM -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote:
 
 This is a sparc only FTBFS, and none of us own a sparc machine. Does
 anybody have a spare one they could let me (or somebody else in the
 Perl group) ssh into to debug it?
 

the upstream author of libdevel-declare-perl thinks that this could be
the same as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505415
so if somebody with a sparc machine could just rebuild
libdevel-declare-perl against the perl in experimental and confirm
that it builds, that would be sufficient.

Cheers,
Ryan

-- 
_
Ryan Niebur
ryanrya...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature