Bug#550233: arpwatch 2.1a15 NMU
Hi there, On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 at 08:18:00 +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > > and i'll change the version number to 2.15a-0.2 > > Too late, that version number is less than the one you uploaded, so it'd be > rejected at upload; 2.15a-1.1 would be correct, now. any progress here? Looks like you stalled somewhere. Thanks, Jan. -- Never write mail to , you have been warned! -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h r+++ y --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#550233: arpwatch 2.1a15 NMU
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 08:52:05PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > It appears that your previous NMU of arpwatch introduced a couple of RC bugs > (#550233 and #552792, both Cc'd) that you might not be aware of. Could you > have a look at them, please? thanks for the heads-up, i wasn't aware of these bug reports. the bug tracker doesn't CC the NMU email address. perhaps it should. i'll make some time on the weekend to fix them. i'll probably just remove the conffile status from ethercodes.dat. it doesn't update very often, and it's not that big a deal to be running with an older version. > (As an aside: NMUs that are new upstream versions should be versioned > like 2.15a-0.1 to indicate that they're NMUs.) and i'll change the version number to 2.15a-0.2 craig -- craig sanders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
