Bug#569198: FTBFS [hppa] - free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938

2010-02-13 Thread dann frazier
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 05:40:14PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> 
> Hi Dann,
> 
> How do I close this bug now that you 'expanded' it to older versions
> dominated by the one in unstable that fixes the bug you reported?

You can close a bug by sending a message to
-d...@bugs.debian.org, with the first line of the body being:

Version: 

I hope its clear why I reopened the bug - I assume it is since you
fixed it in a subsequent upload.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100214012508.gh28...@lackof.org



Bug#569198: FTBFS [hppa] - free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938

2010-02-13 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

Hi Dann,

How do I close this bug now that you 'expanded' it to older versions
dominated by the one in unstable that fixes the bug you reported?

Thanks, Dirk

-- 
  Registration is open for the 2nd International conference R / Finance 2010
  See http://www.RinFinance.com for details, and see you in Chicago in April!



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/19319.14430.316157.862...@ron.nulle.part



Bug#569198: FTBFS [hppa] - free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938

2010-02-11 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 10 February 2010 at 19:23, dann frazier wrote:
| [cc'ing debian-admin as an fyi]
| 
| On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:10:54PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > 
| > On 10 February 2010 at 18:50, dann frazier wrote:
| > | On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 07:31:49PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| [...]
| > | > Could you try a build without this 'make check; make benchmark' step ?
| > | 
| > | You should be able to do this test in the sid chroot on paer - it
| > | should be practically identical to the buildd environment. If you have
| > | any arch-specific questions, debian-hppa is a good place to ask.
| > 
| > Could you please install libboost-test-dev -- the rest of the build-deps
| > seems covered:
| > 
| >debhelper (>= 7.0), autoconf, automake1.7, texinfo, libboost-dev (>= 
1.34.0), libboost-test-dev (>= 1.34.0), g++ (>= 4:4.1.1-15)
| 
| Sure - looks like automake1.7 was missing too. I also upgraded the
| chroot.

It happens in 'make benchmark' which nobody but me uses :-/ I'll report to
upstream to jointly investigate (and it may just be a Boost test issue), but
will also comment-out for now.

Dirk 

-- 
  Registration is open for the 2nd International conference R / Finance 2010
  See http://www.RinFinance.com for details, and see you in Chicago in April!



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#569198: FTBFS [hppa] - free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938

2010-02-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 10 February 2010 at 19:23, dann frazier wrote:
| [cc'ing debian-admin as an fyi]
| 
| On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:10:54PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > 
| > On 10 February 2010 at 18:50, dann frazier wrote:
| > | On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 07:31:49PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| [...]
| > | > Could you try a build without this 'make check; make benchmark' step ?
| > | 
| > | You should be able to do this test in the sid chroot on paer - it
| > | should be practically identical to the buildd environment. If you have
| > | any arch-specific questions, debian-hppa is a good place to ask.
| > 
| > Could you please install libboost-test-dev -- the rest of the build-deps
| > seems covered:
| > 
| >debhelper (>= 7.0), autoconf, automake1.7, texinfo, libboost-dev (>= 
1.34.0), libboost-test-dev (>= 1.34.0), g++ (>= 4:4.1.1-15)
| 
| Sure - looks like automake1.7 was missing too. I also upgraded the
| chroot.

Yes, sorry, I meant the sid chroot. Many thanks. (And automake is a
currently-commented-out leftover from when we need to run automake when
building from svn; that wasn't binding -- but good catch.)

Dirk

-- 
  Registration is open for the 2nd International conference R / Finance 2010
  See http://www.RinFinance.com for details, and see you in Chicago in April!



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#569198: FTBFS [hppa] - free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938

2010-02-10 Thread dann frazier
[cc'ing debian-admin as an fyi]

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:10:54PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> 
> On 10 February 2010 at 18:50, dann frazier wrote:
> | On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 07:31:49PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
[...]
> | > Could you try a build without this 'make check; make benchmark' step ?
> | 
> | You should be able to do this test in the sid chroot on paer - it
> | should be practically identical to the buildd environment. If you have
> | any arch-specific questions, debian-hppa is a good place to ask.
> 
> Could you please install libboost-test-dev -- the rest of the build-deps
> seems covered:
> 
>debhelper (>= 7.0), autoconf, automake1.7, texinfo, libboost-dev (>= 
> 1.34.0), libboost-test-dev (>= 1.34.0), g++ (>= 4:4.1.1-15)

Sure - looks like automake1.7 was missing too. I also upgraded the
chroot.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#569198: FTBFS [hppa] - free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938

2010-02-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 10 February 2010 at 18:50, dann frazier wrote:
| On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 07:31:49PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > 
| > Hi Dann,
| 
| hey Dirk!
| 
| > 
| > On 10 February 2010 at 11:12, dann frazier wrote:
| > | Source: quantlib
| > | Version: 1.0.0~20100112-1
| > | Severity: serious
| > |
| > | >From a recent build attempt on hppa:
| > | [...]
| > | ==
| > | Testing QuantLib 1.0b1
| > | ==
| > | *** glibc detected *** 
/build/buildd-quantlib_1.0.0~20100112-1-hppa-H12qa6/quantlib-1.0.0~20100112/test-suite/.libs/lt-quantlib-test-suite:
 free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938 ***
| > | make[1]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
| > | make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
| > | make[1]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
| > | E: Caught signal 'Terminated': terminating immediately
| > | make[3]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
| > | make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
| > | make[3]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
| > | make: *** [test-stamp] Terminated
| > | make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
| > | Build killed with signal TERM after 300 minutes of inactivity
| >  
| > 300 minutes is a long time. What do you suggest we do?
| 
| It would probably be useful to see what is causing glibc to detect an
| invalid pointer in a call to free(). This has been consistent in the
| last 3 build attempts, and it maybe related to this hang. I don't have
| any reason to believe glibc is detecting a false positive here.
| 
| >  I already skip the
| > tests here in debian/rules:
| > 
| >cpu  := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_CPU)
| > 
| >[...]
| > 
| >test:test-stamp 
| >test-stamp: build-stamp
| >ifeq "$(findstring $(cpu), m68k arm armeb mipsel mips)" ""
| >-LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(CURDIR)/ql/.libs $(MAKE) check
| >-LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(CURDIR)/ql/.libs $(MAKE) benchmark
| >endif
| >touch test-stamp
| > 
| > It may make sense to add hppa to the list. What do you think?  Could you try
| > a build without this 'make check; make benchmark' step ?
| 
| You should be able to do this test in the sid chroot on paer - it
| should be practically identical to the buildd environment. If you have
| any arch-specific questions, debian-hppa is a good place to ask.

Could you please install libboost-test-dev -- the rest of the build-deps
seems covered:

   debhelper (>= 7.0), autoconf, automake1.7, texinfo, libboost-dev (>= 
1.34.0), libboost-test-dev (>= 1.34.0), g++ (>= 4:4.1.1-15)

Dirk


-- 
  Registration is open for the 2nd International conference R / Finance 2010
  See http://www.RinFinance.com for details, and see you in Chicago in April!



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#569198: FTBFS [hppa] - free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938

2010-02-10 Thread dann frazier
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 07:31:49PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> 
> Hi Dann,

hey Dirk!

> 
> On 10 February 2010 at 11:12, dann frazier wrote:
> | Source: quantlib
> | Version: 1.0.0~20100112-1
> | Severity: serious
> |
> | >From a recent build attempt on hppa:
> | [...]
> | ==
> | Testing QuantLib 1.0b1
> | ==
> | *** glibc detected *** 
> /build/buildd-quantlib_1.0.0~20100112-1-hppa-H12qa6/quantlib-1.0.0~20100112/test-suite/.libs/lt-quantlib-test-suite:
>  free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938 ***
> | make[1]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
> | make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
> | make[1]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
> | E: Caught signal 'Terminated': terminating immediately
> | make[3]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
> | make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
> | make[3]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
> | make: *** [test-stamp] Terminated
> | make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
> | Build killed with signal TERM after 300 minutes of inactivity
>  
> 300 minutes is a long time. What do you suggest we do?

It would probably be useful to see what is causing glibc to detect an
invalid pointer in a call to free(). This has been consistent in the
last 3 build attempts, and it maybe related to this hang. I don't have
any reason to believe glibc is detecting a false positive here.

>  I already skip the
> tests here in debian/rules:
> 
>cpu:= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_CPU)
> 
>[...]
> 
>test:  test-stamp 
>test-stamp: build-stamp
>ifeq "$(findstring $(cpu), m68k arm armeb mipsel mips)" ""
>  -LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(CURDIR)/ql/.libs $(MAKE) check
>  -LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(CURDIR)/ql/.libs $(MAKE) benchmark
>endif
>  touch test-stamp
> 
> It may make sense to add hppa to the list. What do you think?  Could you try
> a build without this 'make check; make benchmark' step ?

You should be able to do this test in the sid chroot on paer - it
should be practically identical to the buildd environment. If you have
any arch-specific questions, debian-hppa is a good place to ask.

-- 
dann frazier




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#569198: FTBFS [hppa] - free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938

2010-02-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

Hi Dann,


On 10 February 2010 at 11:12, dann frazier wrote:
| Source: quantlib
| Version: 1.0.0~20100112-1
| Severity: serious
|
| >From a recent build attempt on hppa:
| [...]
| ==
| Testing QuantLib 1.0b1
| ==
| *** glibc detected *** 
/build/buildd-quantlib_1.0.0~20100112-1-hppa-H12qa6/quantlib-1.0.0~20100112/test-suite/.libs/lt-quantlib-test-suite:
 free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938 ***
| make[1]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
| make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
| make[1]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
| E: Caught signal 'Terminated': terminating immediately
| make[3]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
| make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
| make[3]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
| make: *** [test-stamp] Terminated
| make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
| Build killed with signal TERM after 300 minutes of inactivity
 
300 minutes is a long time. What do you suggest we do?  I already skip the
tests here in debian/rules:

   cpu  := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_CPU)

   [...]

   test:test-stamp 
   test-stamp: build-stamp
   ifeq "$(findstring $(cpu), m68k arm armeb mipsel mips)" ""
   -LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(CURDIR)/ql/.libs $(MAKE) check
   -LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(CURDIR)/ql/.libs $(MAKE) benchmark
   endif
   touch test-stamp

It may make sense to add hppa to the list. What do you think?  Could you try
a build without this 'make check; make benchmark' step ?

Dirk
 

-- 
  Registration is open for the 2nd International conference R / Finance 2010
  See http://www.RinFinance.com for details, and see you in Chicago in April!



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#569198: FTBFS [hppa] - free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938

2010-02-10 Thread dann frazier
Source: quantlib
Version: 1.0.0~20100112-1
Severity: serious

>From a recent build attempt on hppa:
[...]
==
Testing QuantLib 1.0b1
==
*** glibc detected *** 
/build/buildd-quantlib_1.0.0~20100112-1-hppa-H12qa6/quantlib-1.0.0~20100112/test-suite/.libs/lt-quantlib-test-suite:
 free(): invalid pointer: 0x0093e938 ***
make[1]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
make[1]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
E: Caught signal 'Terminated': terminating immediately
make[3]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
make[3]: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
make: *** [test-stamp] Terminated
make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
Build killed with signal TERM after 300 minutes of inactivity



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org