Bug#584653: Ghostscript 9.0 does not seem to have the problem
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Version: 9.00~dfsg-1 On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:38:30PM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote: I used the "doh" recipe to reproduce the bug on sid. That works fine. I just installed ghostscript 9.0 from Jonas's repositories. That recipe no longer reproduces the bug. This is great news. Thanks a lot for your help testing this! For completeness sake, could you please tell on which version of Debian (squeeze, sid) you tested this? sid, for what it's worth! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584653: Ghostscript 9.0 does not seem to have the problem
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:23:39AM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote: On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Version: 9.00~dfsg-1 On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:38:30PM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote: I used the "doh" recipe to reproduce the bug on sid. That works fine. I just installed ghostscript 9.0 from Jonas's repositories. That recipe no longer reproduces the bug. This is great news. Thanks a lot for your help testing this! For completeness sake, could you please tell on which version of Debian (squeeze, sid) you tested this? sid, for what it's worth! Thanks! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#584653: Ghostscript 9.0 does not seem to have the problem
I used the "doh" recipe to reproduce the bug on sid. That works fine. I just installed ghostscript 9.0 from Jonas's repositories. That recipe no longer reproduces the bug. -- Asheesh. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
