Bug#592615: flashplugin-nonfree: next to impossible to NMU the package

2010-08-17 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 03:41:17PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Package: flashplugin-nonfree
> Version: 1:2.8.1
> Severity: serious
> 
>   Hi!
> 
>  The package contains a fixed URL to downloadurl from
> http://people.debian.org/~bartm/flashplugin-nonfree/ which isn't
> accessible by any other DD than bartm himself. Furthermore, it includes
> pubkey.asc which only contains a single key which is (hopefully) only
> shared amongst bartm himself:
> 
> pub   4096R/3B5821CC 2009-06-15
> uid  Bart Martens 
> uid  Bart Martens 
> sub   4096R/270D1D5B 2009-06-15
> 
>  This makes the package almost impossible to update for others without
> changing the downloadurl (and creating a special space for it) and the
> included pubkey, to update for e.g. a new flash player version or
> anything else.
> 
>  I don't think this is what can be considered to match the DFSG and thus
> the package itself should go to non-free instead.

I disagree. In a NMU you could just as well point the download URL
to a different download page and sign it with your own key. The
requirements imposed by the signed download are technically 
inherent and not a violation of the DFSG.

Cheers,
Moritz



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#592615: flashplugin-nonfree: next to impossible to NMU the package

2010-08-11 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:2.8.1
Severity: serious

Hi!

 The package contains a fixed URL to downloadurl from
http://people.debian.org/~bartm/flashplugin-nonfree/ which isn't
accessible by any other DD than bartm himself. Furthermore, it includes
pubkey.asc which only contains a single key which is (hopefully) only
shared amongst bartm himself:

pub   4096R/3B5821CC 2009-06-15
uid  Bart Martens 
uid  Bart Martens 
sub   4096R/270D1D5B 2009-06-15

 This makes the package almost impossible to update for others without
changing the downloadurl (and creating a special space for it) and the
included pubkey, to update for e.g. a new flash player version or
anything else.

 I don't think this is what can be considered to match the DFSG and thus
the package itself should go to non-free instead.

 Thanks,
Rhonda
-- 
"Lediglich 11 Prozent der Arbeitgeber sind der Meinung, dass jeder
Mensch auch ein Privatleben haben sollte."
-- http://www.karriere.at/artikel/884/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org