Bug#606238: OBJECTION
Hello, On sekmadienis 12 Gruodis 2010 07:30:24 Hideki Yamane wrote: If k3b version 2 is sufficiently stable, why isn't it part of the backports? FWIW, k3b 2 cannot be backported because it's based on KDE 4 Platform which is way too outdated in lenny. I was unaware that KDE 4 is a requirement. It is an unfortunate dependency. # And if I'm not serious - I would just leave bug reports away ;) I bought DVD media to check this bug, at least. You did well, no need to leave anything. I agree and appreciate the explanations given above. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#606238: OBJECTION
Hello, On sekmadienis 12 Gruodis 2010 07:30:24 Hideki Yamane wrote: If k3b version 2 is sufficiently stable, why isn't it part of the backports? FWIW, k3b 2 cannot be backported because it's based on KDE 4 Platform which is way too outdated in lenny. # And if I'm not serious - I would just leave bug reports away ;) I bought DVD media to check this bug, at least. You did well, no need to leave anything. -- Modestas Vainius modes...@vainius.eu signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#606238: OBJECTION
Hi Peter, # Please add me to CC: I object to the just upgrade to squeeze and be silent approach. Squeeze is not the stable distribution yet, and one should not be forced to go to testing. No, - it's already fixed in 2.0.0. - I just said consider, not to force you to upgrade. I can't force you to do anything. If k3b version 2 is sufficiently stable, why isn't it part of the backports? Sorry, I'm not maintain k3b package and don't know about it, feel free to request to ask backports. # And if I'm not serious - I would just leave bug reports away ;) I bought DVD media to check this bug, at least. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#606238: OBJECTION
I object to the just upgrade to squeeze and be silent approach. Squeeze is not the stable distribution yet, and one should not be forced to go to testing. If k3b version 2 is sufficiently stable, why isn't it part of the backports? I kindly ask to take bug reports more seriously. Peter Hombach -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#606238: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#606238: OBJECTION
Hello, On penktadienis 10 Gruodis 2010 19:07:32 Peter Hombach wrote: I object to the just upgrade to squeeze and be silent approach. Squeeze is not the stable distribution yet, and one should not be forced to go to testing. If k3b version 2 is sufficiently stable, why isn't it part of the backports? I kindly ask to take bug reports more seriously. We are very serious. The bug is fixed 2.0.0 and it's appropriately noted. The rest is up to you entirely. -- Modestas Vainius modes...@vainius.eu signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
