Processed: Re: Bug#613522: [akregator] Please use upstream metakit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 613522 wishlist Bug #613522 [akregator] [akregator] Please use upstream metakit Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious' > tags 613522 wontfix Bug #613522 [akregator] [akregator] Please use upstream metakit Added tag(s) wontfix. > unblock 590147 by 613522 Bug #590147 [akregator] akregator crashes at start Was blocked by: 613522 Removed blocking bug(s) of 590147: 613522 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 590147: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590147 613522: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613522 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613522: [akregator] Please use upstream metakit
severity 613522 wishlist tags 613522 wontfix unblock 590147 by 613522 thanks Hello, On antradienis 15 Vasaris 2011 15:11:24 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Package: akregator > Version: 4:4.4.7-3 > Severity: serious > > Please use separate source for metakit. Serious because it is code > duplication, lead to dataloss and moreover package is outdated. Your reasons for serious are just wrong. There is NO metakit source package in Debian so there is NO dublication. What is more, metakit library is hopelessly outdated upstream (2007 is the latest release date) and there is no proof that new version would fix current akregator problems. Actually, the metakit lib that is currently embedded in the akregator (2.4.9.5), has no interesting changes in comparison with the current metakit stable release (2.4.9.7) (yes, I have actually checked). So please do not exagerate bug severities based on pure guesses. You could have saved some valuable time for everybody. Future is akonadi-based akregator and, obviously, we are not interested in maintaining a dead library just for the sake of it. Moreover, unless you can actually confirm the fix for 590147, do not add false information to the BTS. P.S. Users should never set serious severity unless they can pin point Debian policy violation. You obviously failed to do so in this case. -- Modestas Vainius signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#613522: [akregator] Please use upstream metakit
Package: akregator Version: 4:4.4.7-3 Severity: serious Please use separate source for metakit. Serious because it is code duplication, lead to dataloss and moreover package is outdated. See for a starting point ubuntu package http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=all&searchon=names&keywords=libmetakit Thanks --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 2.6.36reiser Debian Release: 6.0 550 testing ftp.fr.debian.org 500 unstableftp.fr.debian.org 1 experimentalftp.fr.debian.org --- Package information. --- Depends(Version) | Installed -+- kdebase-runtime | 4:4.4.5-1 libc6 (>= 2.2.5) | 2.11.2-10 libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1) | 1:4.4.5-8 libkde3support4 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.5-2 libkdecore5 (>= 4:4.4.4-2~) | 4:4.4.5-2 libkdepim4 (= 4:4.4.7-3) | 4:4.4.7-3 libkdeui5 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.5-2 libkhtml5 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.5-2 libkio5 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.5-2 libknotifyconfig4 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.5-2 libkontactinterface4(>= 4:4.4.0) | 4:4.4.5-2 libkparts4(>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.5-2 libkpimutils4 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.5-2 libkutils4(>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.5-2 libqt4-dbus (>= 4:4.5.3) | 4:4.6.3-4 libqt4-xml (>= 4:4.5.3) | 4:4.6.3-4 libqtcore4 (>= 4:4.6.1) | 4:4.6.3-4 libqtgui4 (>= 4:4.5.3) | 4:4.6.3-4 libstdc++6(>= 4.4.0) | 4.4.5-8 libsyndication4 (>= 4:4.4) | 4:4.4.5-2 Package's Recommends field is empty. Package's Suggests field is empty. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
