Bug#621890: haxe & kfreebsd buildd
Petr Salinger writes: It fails in a local kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) exactly the same way -- so it seems to be rather reproducible. > >>> I tried it today and it does not fail in my local >>> kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) :-( > >> With or without sbuild involved? > > Without. > > Plain "dpkg-buildpackage -B -uc". Outside schroot / sbuild it works here as well. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgphapUi395UG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#621890: haxe & kfreebsd buildd
It fails in a local kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) exactly the same way -- so it seems to be rather reproducible. I tried it today and it does not fail in my local kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) :-( With or without sbuild involved? Without. Plain "dpkg-buildpackage -B -uc". Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#621890: haxe & kfreebsd buildd
Petr Salinger writes: >> It fails in a local kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) exactly the same way -- so >> it seems to be rather reproducible. > > I tried it today and it does not fail in my local > kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) :-( With or without sbuild involved? Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgp9QoQeDpLpP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#621890: haxe & kfreebsd buildd
It fails in a local kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) exactly the same way -- so it seems to be rather reproducible. I tried it today and it does not fail in my local kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) :-( Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#621890: haxe & kfreebsd buildd
On 2011-04-30 10:57, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > I removed it because it wasn't ready when we needed to migrate OCaml. > Now OCaml migrated, haxe will migrate again as soon as it's fixed > everywhere (e.g. on kfeeebsd-*). > > Besides, I don't see any reason to exclude haxe from kfeebsd-*, it > should be able to build again (somehow). Great, thanks! Cheers, /JP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#621890: haxe & kfreebsd buildd
On 0, Jens Peter Secher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, it seem that me...@debian.org has somehow requested that haxe is > removed from testing. I assume it is because it does not build on > kfreebsd. (Is it?) > I removed it because it wasn't ready when we needed to migrate OCaml. Now OCaml migrated, haxe will migrate again as soon as it's fixed everywhere (e.g. on kfeeebsd-*). Besides, I don't see any reason to exclude haxe from kfeebsd-*, it should be able to build again (somehow). Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#621890: haxe & kfreebsd buildd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, it seem that me...@debian.org has somehow requested that haxe is removed from testing. I assume it is because it does not build on kfreebsd. (Is it?) Now, when I build the package manually on kfreebsd-amd64, it works fine. There have been such buildd problems before with the exact same error message. So, I cannot do anything about it. Does this mean that I have to exclude the haxe package from kfreebsd? Please advice. Cheers, - -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iJwEAQECAAYFAk27QqgACgkQiFVdEFPVQL9VhAP/YpbJ4KNDtS7LUx3zoV6Pdmcl L4SdMVp3v/1xONaAE7FTmVAfKBAetspUyMyoEG8NSt2hXhDGZtEASLgJmnyji6nT v77a2UVvKQBaLtjkFf8GH1AtFxMKcdgh1QPZX/RUdBecSxRPEnOSfXyCMm3xceWg MBaHitVYqmndmJZW8Jw= =BEYx -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#621890: haxe & kfreebsd buildd
Hi, Jens Peter Secher (30/04/2011): > Hi, it seem that me...@debian.org has somehow requested that haxe is > removed from testing. I assume it is because it does not build on > kfreebsd. (Is it?) you should ask him, not me. > So, I cannot do anything about it. Does this mean that I have to > exclude the haxe package from kfreebsd? Please advice. Please talk to the buildd maintainers and to the porters: $arch@buildd.d.o debian-bsd@lists.d.o Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#621890: haxe & kfreebsd buildd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, it seem that me...@debian.org has somehow requested that haxe is removed from testing. I assume it is because it does not build on kfreebsd. (Is it?) Now, when I build the package manually on kfreebsd, it works fine. There have been such buildd problems before with the exact same error message. So, I cannot do anything about it. Does this mean that I have to exclude the haxe package from kfreebsd? Please advice. - -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iJwEAQECAAYFAk27PbkACgkQiFVdEFPVQL/0XAQAws6SPYnH8JbuNiuAZm0Fl8UN SgXijaAIdP8aoVMPBWw361W6Agy0OE7kfEFI95wX8Q4nK4kjE8WRU0q55JiRjgQE Lbwsff3VLuMU6ci0K/qhaaAZdub9FsZGRkZSxGJxiMD2E7uzAMRZe4wjFxvQGIOq UIgxnNXrSk6e2RA67Zk= =1Sso -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
