Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:50:46 -0700
with message-id <20110801165046.gk...@lunixsys.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#636188: Please use libreadline-gplv2-dev instead of 
libreadline5-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #636188,
regarding Please use libreadline-gplv2-dev instead of libreadline5-dev
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
636188: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636188
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xscorch
Severity: serious

Please transition to use libreadline6-dev instead of libreadline5-dev,
the readline maintainer has said everyone should use version 6 except
your package's license does not allow. Package libreadline5-dev has
gone from unstable, so your package on mentors.debian.net FTBFS
because missing dependency and cannot be sponsored.

Note: buildd only consider the first candidate in Build-Depends list,
which means  "libreadline5-dev | libreadline6-dev" in build-dep equals
to simply "libreadline5-dev".

Please drop me a line when you have updated it, don't forget to add
RFS at the beginning of the mail's subject line.

-- 
Regards,
Aron Xu



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Actually, this bug is not found in any version in Debian.  If you check 
the control file for the previous versions here are the dependencies:

Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7), groff, libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, 
libmikmod2-dev, libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxi-dev
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}

This is because the readline support is a soft dependency (an 
enhancement) and the package builds fine without it.  The dependency had 
been missed in previous versions and was just added in the version on 
mentors.d.n.

Since the bug is not actually found in Debian, I am closing it.  
Regarding the GPL issue, before I submit an update I will see if we can 
change to GPL v3, which I assume would resolve the issue in a more 
satisfactory manner anyway.

Thanks,
-Jacob


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to