Bug#642162: problem with closures on kfreebsd-amd64
I tried the same on my PC, testsuite of all available (stable, sid, experimental) libffi passes. On asdfasdf.d.n they fails. Could be this related to CPU ? My is "Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750" asdfasdf's "AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+" Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#642162: problem with closures on kfreebsd-amd64
Petr Salinger wrote: > I tried the same on my PC, > testsuite of all available (stable, sid, experimental) libffi passes. > > On asdfasdf.d.n they fails. > Could be this related to CPU ? > My is "Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750" > asdfasdf's "AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+" I think so -- libffi's testsuite fails on fasch, but succeeds on fano. Meanwhile, it would be nice to give-back gnustep-base on fano; if it builds successfully it will be another confirmation to your suspicion and will allow us to proceed with the GNUstep transition while the libffi bug is investigated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#642162: problem with closures on kfreebsd-amd64
user debian-...@lists.debian.org usertag 642928 + kfreebsd usertag 642162 + kfreebsd -- Could be this related to CPU ? My is "Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750" asdfasdf's "AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+" After changing configure.ac and propagating it into configure, the testsuite of 3.0.11~rc1-2 succeeds also on asdfasdf.d.n === libffi Summary === # of expected passes1649 # of unsupported tests 15 --- configure.ac +++ configure.ac @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ [Cannot use PROT_EXEC on this target, so, we revert to alternative means]) ;; - *-apple-darwin10* | *-*-freebsd* | *-*-openbsd* | *-pc-solaris*) + *-apple-darwin10* | *-*-freebsd* | *-*-kfreebsd* | *-*-openbsd* | *-pc-solaris*) AC_DEFINE(FFI_MMAP_EXEC_WRIT, 1, [Cannot use malloc on this target, so, we revert to alternative means]) IMHO, similar change might help to solve "gcj fails under fash.d.o, but not fano.d.o". Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#642162: problem with closures on kfreebsd-amd64
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:33:19PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > user debian-...@lists.debian.org > usertag 642928 + kfreebsd > usertag 642162 + kfreebsd > -- > > >Could be this related to CPU ? > >My is "Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750" > >asdfasdf's "AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+" > > After changing configure.ac and propagating it into > configure, the testsuite of 3.0.11~rc1-2 succeeds > also on asdfasdf.d.n > > === libffi Summary === > > # of expected passes1649 > # of unsupported tests 15 > > > --- configure.ac > +++ configure.ac > @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ > [Cannot use PROT_EXEC on this target, so, we revert to > alternative means]) > ;; > - *-apple-darwin10* | *-*-freebsd* | *-*-openbsd* | *-pc-solaris*) > + *-apple-darwin10* | *-*-freebsd* | *-*-kfreebsd* | *-*-openbsd* | > *-pc-solaris*) > AC_DEFINE(FFI_MMAP_EXEC_WRIT, 1, > [Cannot use malloc on this target, so, we revert to > alternative means]) > > > IMHO, similar change might help to solve > "gcj fails under fash.d.o, but not fano.d.o". > I confirm it also fixes gcj. Yay \o/ -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#642928: Bug#642162: problem with closures on kfreebsd-amd64
tags 642928 + patch thanks Petr Salinger wrote: > After changing configure.ac and propagating it into > configure, the testsuite of 3.0.11~rc1-2 succeeds > also on asdfasdf.d.n Excellent, I successfully tested it too. Thanks very much, Petr! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#642162: problem with closures on kfreebsd-amd64
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 642928 + patch Bug #642928 [libffi5] Problem with closures on kfreebsd-amd64 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 642928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642928 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
