could you forward/check in this upstream?
On 09/26/2011 10:33 PM, Petr Salinger wrote:
user debian-...@lists.debian.org
usertag 642928 + kfreebsd
usertag 642162 + kfreebsd
--
Could be this related to CPU ?
My is Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750
asdfasdf's AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+
After changing configure.ac and propagating it into
configure, the testsuite of 3.0.11~rc1-2 succeeds
also on asdfasdf.d.n
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes1649
# of unsupported tests 15
--- configure.ac
+++ configure.ac
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@
[Cannot use PROT_EXEC on this target, so, we revert to
alternative means])
;;
- *-apple-darwin10* | *-*-freebsd* | *-*-openbsd* | *-pc-solaris*)
+ *-apple-darwin10* | *-*-freebsd* | *-*-kfreebsd* | *-*-openbsd* |
*-pc-solaris*)
AC_DEFINE(FFI_MMAP_EXEC_WRIT, 1,
[Cannot use malloc on this target, so, we revert to
alternative means])
IMHO, similar change might help to solve
gcj fails under fash.d.o, but not fano.d.o.
Petr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org