Bug#692852: dolfin: Avoid hardcoding the swig2.0 version
On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 09:06:06 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > But rebuilding it in sid now with the proposed patch would make it > > uninstallable in wheezy, which still has swig2.0 2.0.7. > > I guess we should tag this bug 'sid' for the time being? > I agree, this bug only applies to sid. Setting the "sid" tag now. Thanks. > IMHO swig 2.0.8 shouldn't have been uploaded to sid during the freeze in > the first place. Ack. > Now that the damage is done I do not see why the bug > in dolfin shouldn't be fixed in sid. I didn't look at the patch yet but if > it fills into the binary package a dependency on a sepcific version of > swig then the package won't migrate to wheezy anyway. True, but it migh also block an eventual bugfix upload that should reach wheezy later. Anyway, since this bug doesn't affect testing anymore, I'll stop caring until the wheezy release :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Rod Stewart signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#692852: dolfin: Avoid hardcoding the swig2.0 version
Hi, On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:17:30PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:20:48 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > > This has now made python-dolphin not installable in sid since the version of > > swig in sid has passed to 2.0.8-1 on 2012-10-31. However, python-dolphin > > still > > depends on swig2.0 (>= 2.0.7), swig2.0 (<< 2.0.8~). > > > > Hence raising severity to serious. > > Ack. > But rebuilding it in sid now with the proposed patch would make it > uninstallable in wheezy, which still has swig2.0 2.0.7. > > I guess we should tag this bug 'sid' for the time being? I agree, this bug only applies to sid. Setting the "sid" tag now. IMHO swig 2.0.8 shouldn't have been uploaded to sid during the freeze in the first place. Now that the damage is done I do not see why the bug in dolfin shouldn't be fixed in sid. I didn't look at the patch yet but if it fills into the binary package a dependency on a sepcific version of swig then the package won't migrate to wheezy anyway. -Ralf. -- Ralf Treinen Laboratoire Preuves, Programmes et Systèmes Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France. http://www.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr/~treinen/ => New email address: trei...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr <= -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692852: dolfin: Avoid hardcoding the swig2.0 version
On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:20:48 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > This has now made python-dolphin not installable in sid since the version of > swig in sid has passed to 2.0.8-1 on 2012-10-31. However, python-dolphin still > depends on swig2.0 (>= 2.0.7), swig2.0 (<< 2.0.8~). > > Hence raising severity to serious. Ack. But rebuilding it in sid now with the proposed patch would make it uninstallable in wheezy, which still has swig2.0 2.0.7. I guess we should tag this bug 'sid' for the time being? Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Flying Pickets: I heard it through the grapevine signature.asc Description: Digital signature
