Bug#701257: Could you provide more info, please
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 09:19:24 +0200
Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Well, the bug should be already fixed upstream. We changed the name of
> > the macro.
>
> Cool. Could you point me to the revision that renamed the macro?
Probably this one
>r15398 | dgarcia | 2013-03-12 09:28:38 +0900 (2013年03月12日 (火)) | 2 lines
>
> * undefining TIME_UTC to resolve dbts #701257
Index: CLAM/src/System/Threads/xtime.hxx
===
--- CLAM/src/System/Threads/xtime.hxx (revision 15397)
+++ CLAM/src/System/Threads/xtime.hxx (revision 15398)
@@ -30,6 +30,11 @@
#endif
#include
+// KLUDGE: C11 defines TIME_UTC as macro in time.h
+#ifdef TIME_UTC
+#undef TIME_UTC
+#endif
+
namespace CLAM
{
And I've succeeded to build a package, debdiff attached.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
diff -Nru clam-1.4.0/debian/changelog clam-1.4.0/debian/changelog
--- clam-1.4.0/debian/changelog 2012-05-29 13:48:54.0 +0900
+++ clam-1.4.0/debian/changelog 2014-02-07 23:06:11.0 +0900
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+clam (1.4.0-5.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * debian/patches
+- add bug701257_ignore_TIME_UTC.patch (Closes: #701257)
+
+ -- Hideki Yamane Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:06:09 +0900
+
clam (1.4.0-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non maintainer upload
diff -Nru clam-1.4.0/debian/patches/bug701257_ignore_TIME_UTC.patch clam-1.4.0/debian/patches/bug701257_ignore_TIME_UTC.patch
--- clam-1.4.0/debian/patches/bug701257_ignore_TIME_UTC.patch 1970-01-01 09:00:00.0 +0900
+++ clam-1.4.0/debian/patches/bug701257_ignore_TIME_UTC.patch 2014-02-07 23:05:34.0 +0900
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Description: fix FTBFS with TIME_UTC difinition
+Origin: upstream
+svn diff -r 15397:15398
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/701257
+Last-Update: 2014-02-07
+
+--- clam-1.4.0.orig/src/System/Threads/xtime.hxx
clam-1.4.0/src/System/Threads/xtime.hxx
+@@ -30,6 +30,11 @@
+ #endif
+ #include
+
++// KLUDGE: C11 defines TIME_UTC as macro in time.h
++#ifdef TIME_UTC
++#undef TIME_UTC
++#endif
++
+ namespace CLAM
+ {
+
diff -Nru clam-1.4.0/debian/patches/series clam-1.4.0/debian/patches/series
--- clam-1.4.0/debian/patches/series 2011-05-17 08:58:16.0 +0900
+++ clam-1.4.0/debian/patches/series 2014-02-07 23:04:06.0 +0900
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
ftbfs_NULL
+bug701257_ignore_TIME_UTC.patch
Processed: Re: Bug#701257: Could you provide more info, please
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #701257 [src:clam] clam: ftbfs with GCC-4.8 Added tag(s) patch. -- 701257: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701257 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#701257: Could you provide more info, please
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + upstream fixed-upstream Bug #701257 [src:clam] clam: ftbfs with GCC-4.8 Added tag(s) upstream and fixed-upstream. -- 701257: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701257 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#701257: Could you provide more info, please
Control: tags -1 + upstream fixed-upstream On 2013-06-03 02:22:14, David García Garzón wrote: > Al 03/06/13 01:50, En/na Sebastian Ramacher ha escrit: > > Hi David > > > > On 2013-03-11 16:37:40, David García Garzón wrote: > >> I am one of the developers of the CLAM framework trying to reproduce the > >> bug in Ubuntu (gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.2-2ubuntu1) 4.7.2) with no luck. > >> > >> My guess is that some system headers (in Debian and Gentoo but not in > >> Ubuntu) define TIME_UTC as preprocessor macro. If someone being able to > >> reproduce the bug could confirm this point (by inserting #ifdef TIME_UTC > >> #error) and locating the header we could move forward. > > Thanks for investigating this issue. > > > > Starting with eglibc 2.17 TIME_UTC is defined in time.h. Ubuntu should > > have a version defining TIME_UTC since raring. > > > > Please let me know if I can help you track it down further. > > > > Regards > > Well, the bug should be already fixed upstream. We changed the name of > the macro. Cool. Could you point me to the revision that renamed the macro? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#701257: Could you provide more info, please
Al 03/06/13 01:50, En/na Sebastian Ramacher ha escrit: > Hi David > > On 2013-03-11 16:37:40, David García Garzón wrote: >> I am one of the developers of the CLAM framework trying to reproduce the >> bug in Ubuntu (gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.2-2ubuntu1) 4.7.2) with no luck. >> >> My guess is that some system headers (in Debian and Gentoo but not in >> Ubuntu) define TIME_UTC as preprocessor macro. If someone being able to >> reproduce the bug could confirm this point (by inserting #ifdef TIME_UTC >> #error) and locating the header we could move forward. > Thanks for investigating this issue. > > Starting with eglibc 2.17 TIME_UTC is defined in time.h. Ubuntu should > have a version defining TIME_UTC since raring. > > Please let me know if I can help you track it down further. > > Regards Well, the bug should be already fixed upstream. We changed the name of the macro. David. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#701257: Could you provide more info, please
Hi David On 2013-03-11 16:37:40, David García Garzón wrote: > I am one of the developers of the CLAM framework trying to reproduce the > bug in Ubuntu (gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.2-2ubuntu1) 4.7.2) with no luck. > > My guess is that some system headers (in Debian and Gentoo but not in > Ubuntu) define TIME_UTC as preprocessor macro. If someone being able to > reproduce the bug could confirm this point (by inserting #ifdef TIME_UTC > #error) and locating the header we could move forward. Thanks for investigating this issue. Starting with eglibc 2.17 TIME_UTC is defined in time.h. Ubuntu should have a version defining TIME_UTC since raring. Please let me know if I can help you track it down further. Regards -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
