Bug#710629: Bug#726164: NMU broke previously existing patches
Hi Hideki, On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 07:16:09PM -0400, David Prévot wrote: Package: most Version: 5.0.0a-2.2 Severity: normal The recent most NMU changed the package format to 3.0 without bothering to restore the previously existing patches No debdiff were sent to #710629 either. Ping? The previously existing patches are big, can you please restore them ASAP (not changing the format to 3.0 in an NMU would be appreciated). http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/nondebian/view/most/5.0.0a-2.1 autoconf/config.guess | 964 ++ autoconf/config.sub | 367 ++- lesskeys.rc |5 most.1| 74 ++- src/file.c| 11 src/file.h|1 6 files changed, 844 insertions(+), 578 deletions(-) Regards David signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#710629: Bug#726164: NMU broke previously existing patches
quote who=David Prévot date=Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:31:27AM -0400 Ping? http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/nondebian/view/most/5.0.0a-2.1 I can get to it in Hideki doesn't. The previously existing patches are big, can you please restore them ASAP (not changing the format to 3.0 in an NMU would be appreciated). I agree. I generally welcome NMUs but I do think that NMUs should fix bugs, not overhaul packages. Thanks to everybody who is helping with most! Later, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill m...@atdot.cc http://mako.cc/ Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society is free to use the results. --GNU Manifesto signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#710629: Bug#726164: NMU broke previously existing patches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Mako, Le 14/10/2013 13:17, Benj. Mako Hill a écrit : quote who=David Prévot date=Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:31:27AM -0400 Ping? http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/nondebian/view/most/5.0.0a-2.1 I can get to it in Hideki doesn't. Thanks Mako. If you’re short on time, I’m willing to try and fix that tomorrow or the day after (I’d hate to see the broken version end up in Jessie, even shortly), just say the word (since you’re more aware of the most packaging, I’d prefer if you do, of course). Regards David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSXDVgAAoJEAWMHPlE9r08UF0H/ivYzWknf+zEsZj45PPEZ/Db nm5iOidbMINpoO7d9RM9twiTZqLgsP7GhKPQdSH19ZWwvk+PfU/L2+Juf4p2F1LZ SZwchdZmumjvhil+RCOk6qdXPFUiXJnn/RlYtozka0Ysy2LHNoQqVZj5RE//F/PD u1qy3VqfOqj2M0cJ88D7kb74WCG07he4iwFN0diN4cVy+/gE3zWa3v8YUx1ksymv IQSa0lL+PNEI3QtJp9sKs3Yg0kca5Frpx1838AGR5nv8VX2o70qZQ5+Ae6J/ohv5 UlT2CBcKp3tJG5lxDQTqcd2wzBaVZJzfsLTm92L26pXAp3cxG1pq/K8cMJshtEk= =MWbT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#710629: Bug#726164: NMU broke previously existing patches
quote who=David Prévot date=Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 02:18:09PM -0400 Thanks Mako. If you’re short on time, I’m willing to try and fix that tomorrow or the day after (I’d hate to see the broken version end up in Jessie, even shortly), just say the word (since you’re more aware of the most packaging, I’d prefer if you do, of course). I'm not sure I'm going to be able to get to this in the next day. If you take a stab at it -- even a rough one -- I am happy to take a look at it, tweak it, and upload it. Just send an message with a link to things if you do anything. I'll do the same. Regards, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill m...@atdot.cc http://mako.cc/ Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society is free to use the results. --GNU Manifesto signature.asc Description: Digital signature
