Bug#717239: Bug #717239: partman-ufs: depends on obsolete package
Steven Chamberlain (2013-08-16): > The dependency should be still satisfied on kFreeBSD and Hurd. On > kFreeBSD it's even our default filesystem. > > Since the package is arch: all, is this an actionable bug? It seems to > me no different than say, partman-zfs dependencies not being satisfied > on GNU/Linux. I've just switched partman-ufs from all to kfreebsd-any, and uploaded it from amd64 using -akfreebsd-amd64 since it has no arch-dep code to build, hoping it won't break anything. -bsd@: please yell if something breaks. uninstallability will go away once partman-ufs is decrufted on non-kfreebsd architectures (fixing monolithic image building on these architectures). For the record, partman-zfs was moved back to kfreebsd-any a while ago, and decrufted lately. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#717239: Bug #717239: partman-ufs: depends on obsolete package
The dependency should be still satisfied on kFreeBSD and Hurd. On kFreeBSD it's even our default filesystem. Since the package is arch: all, is this an actionable bug? It seems to me no different than say, partman-zfs dependencies not being satisfied on GNU/Linux. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#717239: Bug #717239: partman-ufs: depends on obsolete package
The dependency should be still satisfied on kFreeBSD and Hurd. On kFreeBSD it's even our default filesystem. Since the package is arch: all, is this an actionable bug? It seems to me no different than say, partman-zfs dependencies not being satisfied on GNU/Linux. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
