Bug#764930: [Pkg-opencl-devel] Bug#764930: beignet: FTBFS - uses versioned llvm commands, but unversioned build dependency
You have my blessing to change the maintainer field if you like, as I won't be able to do as much as is needed in the next days. It would probably make sense for the pkg-opencl-devel list to own this package; I'm willing to be named as uploader, but will need a sponsor to actually upload anything. There is a regression in the last NMU: Ubuntu LLVM has a different epoch, Not any more: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/188131885/buildlog_ubuntu-vivid-amd64.beignet_0.8-1.1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz (FTBFS with this bug, not BD-Uninstallable) There's two Ubuntu bugs that are fixed in 0.9.3: LP#1372889 and LP#1350773. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#764930: [Pkg-opencl-devel] Bug#764930: beignet: FTBFS - uses versioned llvm commands, but unversioned build dependency
I'm just wondering where the build failure in late August with exactly those dependencies came from and why the change fixed them? during compilation clang was called but could not be found: [...] Only the clang metapackage but not the clang-some.version package provides /usr/bin/clang. Agreed; my patch instead fixes that by extending versioned-llvm-tools.patch to add -3.4 to that call as well. If you're offering to NMU this, it would be a good idea to put back the patch description header I accidentally deleted, and to do #767387 at the same time. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
