Bug#769830: [Pkg-running-devel] Bug#769830: fix
Quoting Salvo Tomaselli (tipos...@tiscali.it): On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 07:28:25 +0100 Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: Please leave me a chance to try fixing the issue by a maintainer upload. I'm not the usual uploader for subsurface (Sylvestre is) and then I left him priority to fix that RC bug. But, well, as team member, I still feel the duty of fixing our RC bugs and would then prefer a maintainer upload. Is one week delay OK for you (there are chances I look at this during the week-end) ? Yes this is okay for me. It's just that I've contributed upstream and in Debian, and I wouldn't want the package to be dropped from testing. Given that the package is team-maintained and you are interested in the package itself, how about joining the pkg-running team (OK, the name is now not well adapted as we also maintain other sport-related software but your get the point, of course.so, in short, you don't have to run in order to join the team..:-)) That would indeed also fit my goal of this needed upload to be done from the package's git repo. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#769830: [Pkg-running-devel] Bug#769830: fix
Quoting Salvo Tomaselli (tipos...@tiscali.it): Hello, I attach the fix I made. I've downloaded and added the missing source within the debian/ directory. If the maintainer doesn't respond within 3 days, I will ask another DD to sponsor an nmu with the fix. I've also removed 2 useless build dependencies, vestiges from when the project was based on GTK. I'm signing the attached file. Hello Salvo, thanks for the patch and analysis. Please leave me a chance to try fixing the issue by a maintainer upload. I'm not the usual uploader for subsurface (Sylvestre is) and then I left him priority to fix that RC bug. But, well, as team member, I still feel the duty of fixing our RC bugs and would then prefer a maintainer upload. Is one week delay OK for you (there are chances I look at this during the week-end) ? I would prefer *not* dropping the build dependencies as they're not strictly required to fix the RC issue is I understand well, and would then maybe not qulify for a freeze exception. Do I misunderstand something? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#769830: [Pkg-running-devel] Bug#769830: fix
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 07:28:25 +0100 Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: Please leave me a chance to try fixing the issue by a maintainer upload. I'm not the usual uploader for subsurface (Sylvestre is) and then I left him priority to fix that RC bug. But, well, as team member, I still feel the duty of fixing our RC bugs and would then prefer a maintainer upload. Is one week delay OK for you (there are chances I look at this during the week-end) ? Yes this is okay for me. It's just that I've contributed upstream and in Debian, and I wouldn't want the package to be dropped from testing. I would prefer *not* dropping the build dependencies as they're not strictly required to fix the RC issue is I understand well, and would then maybe not qulify for a freeze exception. Do I misunderstand something? The dependencies were uninstallable on my system, but I contribute upstream and I can compile and use it just fine, so I dropped them rather than spending time to convince them to install. Perhaps it is just a local version problem, but to avoid the build to fail, I thought it was a desiderable action. Best -- Salvo Tomaselli Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse che noi ne facessimo a meno. -- Galileo Galilei http://ltworf.github.io/ltworf/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
