Bug#781995: Bug#782381: Bug#781995: motif/2.3.4-6.1 failed to build
On 25 April 2015 at 10:56, Julien Cristau wrote: > Why does the symbols file include private symbols (i.e. why are > supposedly private symbols being exported by the library in the first > place)? I don't know. I did ask upstream about it in their bug #1565 [1] and got the following response: It is exported in XmI.h as many other internal functions so it's symbol is seen in libXm.so library. But I can't bind it's scope to a file to the symbol since it is called from different widget classes that are defined in different files. [1] http://bugs.motifzone.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1565 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#781995: Bug#782381: Bug#781995: motif/2.3.4-6.1 failed to build
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 14:02:29 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 16-04-15 07:31, Graham Inggs wrote: > > If you uploaded 2.3.4-6.2 now, could it cause any harm? At least this > > will get the package built and Release Team can still decide whether > > to grant the unblock request or not. > > I uploaded the package 2.3.4-8 (I couldn't call it a NMU ;) about an > hour ago for the case that the RT is ok with the current proposal. If > not, we have to see how to fix things later. > Why does the symbols file include private symbols (i.e. why are supposedly private symbols being exported by the library in the first place)? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
