Bug#785867: morituri: Please update to GStreamer 1.x
Hi Moritz, Quoting Moritz Muehlenhoff (2015-11-14 23:18:21) > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 04:03:06PM +0300, sl...@debian.org wrote: >> your package morituri currently still depends on GStreamer 0.10. >> >> GStreamer 0.10 is no longer maintained and supported by the upstream >> project since almost 3 years, and contains many known bugs that are >> fixed in the new 1.x release series of GStreamer. Next to many bug >> fixes, the new release series also contains many other improvements, >> new features and a more streamlined API. > > upstream doesn't seem to plan a port, are you planning to port it > yourself or shall we remove it for now (it can still be re-added if > fixed at a later point in time)? > > https://github.com/thomasvs/morituri/issues/47 Not sure what you propose here. If you mean drop from testing then that happened already 2 weeks before your email. If you mean drop from unstable, then I see no benefit in that, but a drawback is loss of bug tracking. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#785867: morituri: Please update to GStreamer 1.x
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 04:54:11PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi Moritz, > > Quoting Moritz Muehlenhoff (2015-11-14 23:18:21) > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 04:03:06PM +0300, sl...@debian.org wrote: > >> your package morituri currently still depends on GStreamer 0.10. > >> > >> GStreamer 0.10 is no longer maintained and supported by the upstream > >> project since almost 3 years, and contains many known bugs that are > >> fixed in the new 1.x release series of GStreamer. Next to many bug > >> fixes, the new release series also contains many other improvements, > >> new features and a more streamlined API. > > > > upstream doesn't seem to plan a port, are you planning to port it > > yourself or shall we remove it for now (it can still be re-added if > > fixed at a later point in time)? > > > > https://github.com/thomasvs/morituri/issues/47 > > Not sure what you propose here. > > If you mean drop from testing then that happened already 2 weeks before > your email. > > If you mean drop from unstable, then I see no benefit in that, but a > drawback is loss of bug tracking. I'm not sure what you mean by "loss of bugtracking"? gstreamer 0.10 is scheduled for removal from _unstable_, so if upstream is unactive and none of the maintainers plans to port it themselves, it would be subject to removal as well. Cheers, Moritz
Bug#785867: morituri: Please update to GStreamer 1.x
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 04:03:06PM +0300, sl...@debian.org wrote: > Source: morituri > Severity: important > User: sl...@debian.org > Usertags: gstreamer0.10-removal > > Hi maintainer, > > your package morituri currently still depends on GStreamer 0.10. > > GStreamer 0.10 is no longer maintained and supported by the upstream > project since almost 3 years, and contains many known bugs that are > fixed in the new 1.x release series of GStreamer. Next to many bug > fixes, the new release series also contains many other improvements, > new features and a more streamlined API. upstream doesn't seem to plan a port, are you planning to port it yourself or shall we remove it for now (it can still be re-added if fixed at a later point in time)? https://github.com/thomasvs/morituri/issues/47 Cheers, Moritz
