Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> You have a now useless
>
> Breaks: liblttoolbox3-3.3-0v5 (<= 3.3.2~r61000-3.1)
>
> in there.
>
> For the changelog I would say something like "Reinstate the g++-5 ABI
> transition and renamed packages."
Breaks field was removed with latest upload.
--
Kartik Mistry | IRC: kart_
{0x1f1f, kartikm}.wordpress.com
Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1
On 2016-02-06 13:59, Kartik Mistry wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >>> What is the best way to fix this? >> >> Probably reverting the reverted transition, therefore reopening this bug. >> >> You can drop the v5 suffix once upstream bumps the SOVERSION again and >> you have to rename the package anyway. > > I'm preparing fix, Can anyone look at, > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/lttoolbox.git/commit/?id=a3b07fe80d08de83902971f45aab75701bae8cea > and see if it is OK? You have a now useless Breaks: liblttoolbox3-3.3-0v5 (<= 3.3.2~r61000-3.1) in there. For the changelog I would say something like "Reinstate the g++-5 ABI transition and renamed packages." Andreas
Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> What is the best way to fix this?
>
> Probably reverting the reverted transition, therefore reopening this bug.
>
> You can drop the v5 suffix once upstream bumps the SOVERSION again and
> you have to rename the package anyway.
I'm preparing fix, Can anyone look at,
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/lttoolbox.git/commit/?id=a3b07fe80d08de83902971f45aab75701bae8cea
and see if it is OK?
--
Kartik Mistry | IRC: kart_
{0x1f1f, kartikm}.wordpress.com
Processed: Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1
Processing control commands: > found -1 3.3.2~r63423-1 Bug #791195 [src:lttoolbox] lttoolbox: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Marked as found in versions lttoolbox/3.3.2~r63423-1. -- 791195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791195 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1
Control: found -1 3.3.2~r63423-1 On 2016-02-03 11:45, Kartik Mistry wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> The v5 transition was entirely unnecessary for this package, and I very >>> strongly want it gone. >>> >> You haven't given a single good reason to revert the change. Maybe you >> would have preferred it didn't, but you're coming 6 months late to that >> party. > > Apologies! > > What is the best way to fix this? Probably reverting the reverted transition, therefore reopening this bug. You can drop the v5 suffix once upstream bumps the SOVERSION again and you have to rename the package anyway. Andreas
Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> The v5 transition was entirely unnecessary for this package, and I very
>> strongly want it gone.
>>
> You haven't given a single good reason to revert the change. Maybe you
> would have preferred it didn't, but you're coming 6 months late to that
> party.
Apologies!
What is the best way to fix this?
--
Kartik Mistry | IRC: kart_
{0x1f1f, kartikm}.wordpress.com
Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:46:02 +0100, Tino Didriksen wrote: > On 3 February 2016 at 02:57, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:00:44 + Julien Cristau > > wrote: > > > lttoolbox (3.3.2~r61000-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium > > > . > > >* Non-maintainer upload. > > >* Rename library packages for g++5 ABI transition (closes: 791195). > > > > This change was recently reverted and I'm not convinced that this was a > > good idea. > > > > That was my doing, on the basis that the transition should never have > happened. > > Because I wasn't properly subscribed to this bug (due to using my mail@ > address which procmail can't handle), I never knew the transition was > pushed through against my wishes, until I went to update lttoolbox to a > newer release. > > There are only 2 other packages that depend on lttoolbox: apertium and > apertium-lex-tools, and I maintain those as well. All 3 are part of the > same upstream project, and are updated together if there are breaking > changes. > > And because lttoolbox 3.3 was not even in testing at the time, nothing > outside my control could have built up dependencies on it, and indeed > nothing has. > > The v5 transition was entirely unnecessary for this package, and I very > strongly want it gone. > You haven't given a single good reason to revert the change. Maybe you would have preferred it didn't, but you're coming 6 months late to that party. Cheers, Julien
Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1
On 3 February 2016 at 02:57, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:00:44 + Julien Cristau > wrote: > > lttoolbox (3.3.2~r61000-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > >* Non-maintainer upload. > >* Rename library packages for g++5 ABI transition (closes: 791195). > > This change was recently reverted and I'm not convinced that this was a > good idea. That was my doing, on the basis that the transition should never have happened. Because I wasn't properly subscribed to this bug (due to using my mail@ address which procmail can't handle), I never knew the transition was pushed through against my wishes, until I went to update lttoolbox to a newer release. There are only 2 other packages that depend on lttoolbox: apertium and apertium-lex-tools, and I maintain those as well. All 3 are part of the same upstream project, and are updated together if there are breaking changes. And because lttoolbox 3.3 was not even in testing at the time, nothing outside my control could have built up dependencies on it, and indeed nothing has. The v5 transition was entirely unnecessary for this package, and I very strongly want it gone. -- Tino Didriksen
Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:00:44 + Julien Cristau wrote: > lttoolbox (3.3.2~r61000-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Non-maintainer upload. >* Rename library packages for g++5 ABI transition (closes: 791195). This change was recently reverted and I'm not convinced that this was a good idea. lttoolbox (3.3.2~r63423-1) unstable; urgency=low . [ Tino Didriksen ] * New upstream snapshop release. . [ Kartik Mistry ] * debian/control: + Fixed Vcs-* URLs. + Removed dummy library package used for g++5 ABI transition. * debian/patches: + Added patch to fix hyphen used as minus. Andreas
