Bug#850948: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#850948: needrestart, piuparts: needrestart hangs -> piupart fails -> debian-design blocked
Quoting Holger Levsen (2017-01-11 18:25:06) > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 06:14:55PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I believe I stated quite clearly the scope of this bug. > > i dont see the scope. Here it is, again: Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2017-01-11 15:25:10) > This bugreport is tracking debian-design not entering testing. ...and again: Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2017-01-11 15:25:10) > This bugreport is tracking the combined issue of a) + b) + c). ...and here I request keeping severity tied to debian-design: > Please therefore reassign and/or merge as appropriate, but only as > long as the severity reflects the actual treatment of debian-design. In other words, basically the whole content of the bugreport apart from the few lines you yourself quoted. > we have one for needsrestart being buggy and one for the release team > to ignore this for the testing migration of debian-design. I dont see > why another one is needed. You need not understand all needs of Debian. Thanks for trying, though. >> I fail to understand how merging with another (related) bug of >> different severity helps track the issue I reported? > > you know how to handle the bts yourself, feel free to unmerge and > assign somewhere. just not to piuparts (even partly) with RC severity. > feel free to make it wishlist and assign to piuparts (party or not). Yes, I am aware how I can run behind you and clean up after your ignorance. Wish I didn't have to. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#850948: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#850948: needrestart, piuparts: needrestart hangs -> piupart fails -> debian-design blocked
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 06:14:55PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I believe I stated quite clearly the scope of this bug. i dont see the scope. we have one for needsrestart being buggy and one for the release team to ignore this for the testing migration of debian-design. I dont see why another one is needed. > I fail to understand how merging with another (related) bug of different > severity helps track the issue I reported? you know how to handle the bts yourself, feel free to unmerge and assign somewhere. just not to piuparts (even partly) with RC severity. feel free to make it wishlist and assign to piuparts (party or not). -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#850948: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#850948: needrestart, piuparts: needrestart hangs -> piupart fails -> debian-design blocked
Quoting Holger Levsen (2017-01-11 17:16:08) > control: reassign -1 needrestart > control: merge -1 826044 > thanks > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:25:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Package: needrestart,piuparts >> Severity: serious > > no. this is definitly not a serious bug in piuparts. then the bug is somewhere else - merging ruins ability to track where. >> This bugreport is tracking debian-design not entering testing. > > then this bug report would be more appropriate against release.d.o but > Andreas already filed this bug :) I believe I stated quite clearly the scope of this bug. I fail to understand how merging with another (related) bug of different severity helps track the issue I reported? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#850948: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#850948: needrestart, piuparts: needrestart hangs -> piupart fails -> debian-design blocked
control: reassign -1 needrestart control: merge -1 826044 thanks On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:25:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Package: needrestart,piuparts > Severity: serious no. this is definitly not a serious bug in piuparts. > This bugreport is tracking debian-design not entering testing. then this bug report would be more appropriate against release.d.o but Andreas already filed this bug :) -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature
