Bug#885295: gpodder: Depends on unmaintained pygtk

2018-01-08 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Control: severity -1 important

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:55 AM, tony mancill  wrote:
> Status update...  The gPodder 3.10.0 packaging is ready, but as the
> package is now built only for python3, it requires an new binary package
> python3-mygpoclient (from the existing src:mygpoclient) which is
> currently waiting in NEW [1].
>
> Does it make sense to create a bug for the new binary package and then
> block this bug on that bug?  (My hope is that adding a python3- variant to
> an existing python package won't have to spend too long in NEW.)

I don't think we need an extra bug here. I'll lower the severity of
this bug in case the NEW processing takes longer than expected.

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha



Processed: Re: Bug#885295: gpodder: Depends on unmaintained pygtk

2018-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> severity -1 important
Bug #885295 [src:gpodder] gpodder: Depends on unmaintained pygtk
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

-- 
885295: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885295
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#885295: gpodder: Depends on unmaintained pygtk

2018-01-08 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:50:17AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Perl  wrote:
> > Upstream here.
> >
> > gPodder 3.10.0 (just released today) should fix that.
> 
> Thank you!

Status update...  The gPodder 3.10.0 packaging is ready, but as the
package is now built only for python3, it requires an new binary package
python3-mygpoclient (from the existing src:mygpoclient) which is
currently waiting in NEW [1].

Does it make sense to create a bug for the new binary package and then
block this bug on that bug?  (My hope is that adding a python3- variant to
an existing python package won't have to spend too long in NEW.)

Cheers,
tony

[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/mygpoclient_1.8-1.html 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#885295: gpodder: Depends on unmaintained pygtk

2017-12-29 Thread Thomas Perl
Upstream here.

gPodder 3.10.0 (just released today) should fix that.


Thanks,
Thomas

> On 26.12.2017, at 06:38, Jeremy Bicha  wrote:
> 
> Source: gpodder
> Version: 3.9.3-1
> Severity: serious
> User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: oldlibs pygtk
> Tags: sid buster
> 
> pygtk is unmaintained upstream. It has not had a release since GNOME 3
> was released in 2011.
> 
> The way forward is to port your app to use GObject Introspection
> bindings.
> 
> For more information on GObject Introspection see [1] and [2].
> 
> Please try to do this before the Buster release as we're going to
> try to remove pygtk this cycle.
> 
> If you have any question don't hesitate to ask.
> 
> [1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GObjectIntrospection
> [2] https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/PyGObject
> 
> On behalf of the Debian GNOME team,
> Jeremy Bicha



Bug#885295: gpodder: Depends on unmaintained pygtk

2017-12-29 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Perl  wrote:
> Upstream here.
>
> gPodder 3.10.0 (just released today) should fix that.

Thank you!

Jeremy Bicha



Bug#885295: gpodder: Depends on unmaintained pygtk

2017-12-25 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Source: gpodder
Version: 3.9.3-1
Severity: serious
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: oldlibs pygtk
Tags: sid buster

pygtk is unmaintained upstream. It has not had a release since GNOME 3
was released in 2011.

The way forward is to port your app to use GObject Introspection
bindings.

For more information on GObject Introspection see [1] and [2].

Please try to do this before the Buster release as we're going to
try to remove pygtk this cycle.

If you have any question don't hesitate to ask.

[1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GObjectIntrospection
[2] https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/PyGObject

On behalf of the Debian GNOME team,
Jeremy Bicha