Bug#897215: sikulix: SikuliX 1.1.1 does not support Java 9

2018-05-28 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi,

> […]

Note there is an RM bug for this now (#897333, related to #897215)


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-



Bug#897215: sikulix: SikuliX 1.1.1 does not support Java 9

2018-05-27 Thread Gilles Filippini
Hi,

Chris Lamb a écrit le 27/05/2018 à 16:09 :
> severity 897215 serious
> thanks
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> Java 9 is the default in Buster so perhaps this should be RC?
> 
> Indeed it should; adjusting to match.
> 
> Java team, would you object if I went ahead and uploaded the latest
> "branch" of SikuliX? Note that the current upstream repo has been
> entirely deprecated and has been moved to:
> 
>   https://github.com/RaiMan/SikuliX1

You might want to give it a try, but I found SikuliX 1.1.2 in such a bad
shape that I filled a ROM request to remove this package from the archive:

  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=897333

Regards,

_g.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#897215: sikulix: SikuliX 1.1.1 does not support Java 9

2018-05-27 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 03:09:17PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> severity 897215 serious
> thanks
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > Java 9 is the default in Buster so perhaps this should be RC?
> 
> Indeed it should; adjusting to match.
> 
> Java team, would you object if I went ahead and uploaded the latest
> "branch" of SikuliX? Note that the current upstream repo has been
> entirely deprecated and has been moved to:
> 
>   https://github.com/RaiMan/SikuliX1

No objection and a sincere "Thank you!" in advance for helping out with
these transitions...  I have added @lamby to the Java Team in Salsa [1]
so that you can push to the repo.  Let me know if you have any issues
with access, etc.

Cheers,
tony

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/groups/java-team/-/group_members