Bug#951818: sslstrip: should this package be removed?

2020-02-23 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 10:31:08AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 3:25 AM Chow Loong Jin  wrote:
> > [...]
> did you read https://github.com/moxie0/sslstrip/issues/16 where they
> declared the project useless and dead, with a new fork at
> https://github.com/byt3bl33d3r/sslstrip2 , again declared dead at
> https://github.com/byt3bl33d3r/sslstrip2/issues/1 . So maybe this
> functionality is just no longer there.

Fair enough. I had realized that HSTS has largely defeated the sslstrip
attack, but thought it might still be useful for some people (e.g.
demonstrating an old attack). I hadn't realized there was an sslstrip2
though. I guess this should go then.

> > (ported to Python 3 with a distro patch of
> > course).
> 
> are you planning on write this patch? if so, do you know already when
> you're gonna have time to do that?

I had started work on it a couple of days ago and was working through
some byte/string issues but I guess I'll drop it.

-- 
Kind regards,
Loong Jin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#951818: sslstrip: should this package be removed?

2020-02-22 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 3:25 AM Chow Loong Jin  wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 09:39:41PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > Package: sslstrip
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hello,
> > i think sslstrip should be removed from Debian:
> >
> > * python2 only app
> > * low popcon
> > * only r-dep is websploit, recently removed from testing, and which doesnt 
> > use
> >   sslstrip anymore in the latest upstream release
> > * last upstream release and debian upload in 2011 (!)
> > * dead upstream, https://github.com/moxie0/sslstrip/issues/16 and render 
> > mostly
> >   obsolete
> >
> > If i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to keep this package in
> > Debian, i'll file for its removal.
>
> Are there alternative packages that provide this functionality? If not,
> I think it should be kept

did you read https://github.com/moxie0/sslstrip/issues/16 where they
declared the project useless and dead, with a new fork at
https://github.com/byt3bl33d3r/sslstrip2 , again declared dead at
https://github.com/byt3bl33d3r/sslstrip2/issues/1 . So maybe this
functionality is just no longer there.

> (ported to Python 3 with a distro patch of
> course).

are you planning on write this patch? if so, do you know already when
you're gonna have time to do that?

Regards,
-- 
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi



Bug#951818: sslstrip: should this package be removed?

2020-02-22 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 09:39:41PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Package: sslstrip
> Severity: serious
> 
> Hello,
> i think sslstrip should be removed from Debian:
> 
> * python2 only app
> * low popcon
> * only r-dep is websploit, recently removed from testing, and which doesnt use
>   sslstrip anymore in the latest upstream release
> * last upstream release and debian upload in 2011 (!)
> * dead upstream, https://github.com/moxie0/sslstrip/issues/16 and render 
> mostly
>   obsolete
> 
> If i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to keep this package in
> Debian, i'll file for its removal.

Are there alternative packages that provide this functionality? If not,
I think it should be kept (ported to Python 3 with a distro patch of
course).

-- 
Kind regards,
Loong Jin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#951818: sslstrip: should this package be removed?

2020-02-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: sslstrip
Severity: serious

Hello,
i think sslstrip should be removed from Debian:

* python2 only app
* low popcon
* only r-dep is websploit, recently removed from testing, and which doesnt use
  sslstrip anymore in the latest upstream release
* last upstream release and debian upload in 2011 (!)
* dead upstream, https://github.com/moxie0/sslstrip/issues/16 and render mostly
  obsolete

If i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to keep this package in
Debian, i'll file for its removal.

Regards,
Sandro

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.0
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE= 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages sslstrip depends on:
ii  python  2.7.16-1
pn  python-twisted-web  

sslstrip recommends no packages.

sslstrip suggests no packages.