Bug#957160: e17: ftbfs with GCC-10
Control: unblock -1 by 959828 Control: fixed -1 e17/0.24.1-2 Control: tags -1 fixed-in-experimental On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 10:17:21PM -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:59:16AM +, Matthias Klose wrote: > > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > > gcc-10/g++-10, but succeeds to build with gcc-9/g++-9. > > I've confirmed that 0.24.1-1 builds with gcc-10 in a local chroot. But it's > waiting on a fix to #959828 for builds in experimental. 0.24.1-2 has a workaround for #959828, and is now in experimental. Leaving this issue open as requested. Ross
Processed: Re: Bug#957160: e17: ftbfs with GCC-10
Processing control commands: > unblock -1 by 959828 Bug #957160 [src:e17] e17: ftbfs with GCC-10 957160 was blocked by: 959828 957160 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 957160: 959828 > fixed -1 e17/0.24.1-2 Bug #957160 [src:e17] e17: ftbfs with GCC-10 Marked as fixed in versions e17/0.24.1-2. > tags -1 fixed-in-experimental Bug #957160 [src:e17] e17: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) fixed-in-experimental. -- 957160: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957160 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#957160: e17: ftbfs with GCC-10
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 959828 Bug #957160 [src:e17] e17: ftbfs with GCC-10 957160 was not blocked by any bugs. 957160 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 957160: 959828 -- 957160: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957160 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
