Your message dated Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:39:53 +0000
with message-id <e1kripn-0002tx...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#977868: fixed in osmcoastline 2.2.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #977868,
regarding osmcoastline: FTBFS in bullseye and sid
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
977868: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977868
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: osmcoastline
Version: 2.2.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bullseye sid

Hi Maintainer

As per Reproducible Builds [1], osmcoastline FTBFS in bullseye and sid.
I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.

Regards
Graham


[1] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/osmcoastline.html


 1/19 Test  #1: test-invalid-complex-overlap
.............................***Failed    0.29 sec
+ cat
+ /build/1st/osmcoastline-2.2.4/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/osmcoastline
--verbose --overwrite
--output-database=/build/1st/osmcoastline-2.2.4/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/test/invalid-complex-overlap.db
/build/1st/osmcoastline-2.2.4/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/test/invalid-complex-overlap.opl
+ RC=139
+ set -e
+ test 139 -eq 2

      Start 17: test-valid-island-from-one-way
 2/19 Test  #6: test-invalid-node-with-coastline-tag
.....................   Passed    0.49 sec
      Start 18: test-valid-island-from-two-ways
 3/19 Test #13: test-usage-and-help
......................................   Passed    0.44 sec
      Start 19: test-valid-two-small-islands
 4/19 Test  #4: test-invalid-duplicate-segments-2
........................   Passed    0.51 sec
 5/19 Test  #7: test-invalid-part-reversed
...............................   Passed    0.50 sec
 6/19 Test  #2: test-invalid-direction
...................................   Passed    0.53 sec
 7/19 Test  #9: test-invalid-self-intersection-on-closed-ring-one-way
....   Passed    0.53 sec
 8/19 Test #10: test-invalid-self-intersection-on-closed-ring-two-ways
...   Passed    0.59 sec
 9/19 Test  #3: test-invalid-duplicate-segments-1
........................   Passed    0.63 sec
10/19 Test  #5: test-invalid-node-id-mismatch
............................   Passed    0.63 sec
11/19 Test #12: test-overlapping-islands
.................................   Passed    0.60 sec
12/19 Test #15: test-valid-inline-sea-with-island
........................   Passed    0.64 sec
13/19 Test #14: test-valid-antimeridian
..................................   Passed    0.70 sec
14/19 Test #16: test-valid-inline-sea
....................................   Passed    0.68 sec
15/19 Test #17: test-valid-island-from-one-way
...........................   Passed    0.50 sec
16/19 Test #11: test-invalid-self-intersection-on-open-ring
..............   Passed    0.77 sec
17/19 Test #18: test-valid-island-from-two-ways
..........................   Passed    0.45 sec
18/19 Test #19: test-valid-two-small-islands
.............................   Passed    0.45 sec
19/19 Test  #8: test-invalid-ring-not-closed
.............................   Passed    1.12 sec

95% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 19

Total Test time (real) =   1.14 sec

The following tests FAILED:
 1 - test-invalid-complex-overlap (Failed)
Errors while running CTest

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: osmcoastline
Source-Version: 2.2.4-3
Done: Bas Couwenberg <sebas...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
osmcoastline, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 977...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bas Couwenberg <sebas...@debian.org> (supplier of updated osmcoastline package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:58:28 +0100
Source: osmcoastline
Architecture: source
Version: 2.2.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GIS Project <pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bas Couwenberg <sebas...@debian.org>
Closes: 977868
Changes:
 osmcoastline (2.2.4-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Bump watch file version to 4.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.1, no changes.
   * Add upstream patch to fix test-invalid-complex-overlap failure.
     (closes: #977868)
Checksums-Sha1:
 d3a3106d71830ab677bd0eb8dbb8b0321a151f44 2123 osmcoastline_2.2.4-3.dsc
 4f8be49cb0fb18e7a73ce1bdd4c61694a47eb9b9 4464 
osmcoastline_2.2.4-3.debian.tar.xz
 e5b227aeed8f0a0c5852ca6c7eb0df34b279d54a 12326 
osmcoastline_2.2.4-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 674c119276ddf97716ca3d8517cea350211b1ca40a3216754aac6a6d50b8b6d0 2123 
osmcoastline_2.2.4-3.dsc
 bf784d4a85711955e46aec8d780c431f8a713f075e20758e79a16b180c472c50 4464 
osmcoastline_2.2.4-3.debian.tar.xz
 9290e5bd93f85e93e025265b3387a2f53b94563b4f4953097235e23a06ee97b2 12326 
osmcoastline_2.2.4-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 46c8ab55f94100b89798474c5c22c5ab 2123 science optional osmcoastline_2.2.4-3.dsc
 aaf3a7467e3b0ff074d6a53c7abf4499 4464 science optional 
osmcoastline_2.2.4-3.debian.tar.xz
 50058271b336faec69d4af3423d8f67c 12326 science optional 
osmcoastline_2.2.4-3_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ahtl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to